The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 11, 2013, 05:38pm
(Something hilarious)
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: These United States
Posts: 1,162
And unless you work in an IAABO area/state...

I'd stay away from the phrase "over and back," and try to just use rule book terminology when discussing this type of play/possible violation.
__________________
I can't remember the last time I wasn't at least kind-of tired.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 11, 2013, 06:54pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: In the offseason.
Posts: 12,263
Quote:
Originally Posted by HawkeyeCubP View Post
I'd stay away from the phrase "over and back," and try to just use rule book terminology when discussing this type of play/possible violation.
Why? This one accurately describes the situation....unlike over-the-back. I don't think I know of a single official that says anything other than over-and-back.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 11, 2013, 07:03pm
(Something hilarious)
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: These United States
Posts: 1,162
Quote:
Originally Posted by Camron Rust View Post
Why? This one accurately describes the situation....unlike over-the-back. I don't think I know of a single official that says anything other than over-and-back.
Huh. Maybe this is a just me thing, then. I think it's an antiquated term that sounds very junior-high-official. It's not always an accurate term for what that violation is, it's not listed in the rule or case books to my knowledge (NFHS or NCAA), and the only place I know it exists is in the...wait for it...(sarcasm on) my favorite book of all time: the IAABO Officials' Manual, and only in the signal chart.

I personally say "backcourt" or "backcourt violation" while making the signal.
__________________
I can't remember the last time I wasn't at least kind-of tired.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 11, 2013, 07:34pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: In the offseason.
Posts: 12,263
Quote:
Originally Posted by HawkeyeCubP View Post
Huh. Maybe this is a just me thing, then. I think it's an antiquated term that sounds very junior-high-official. It's not always an accurate term for what that violation is, it's not listed in the rule or case books to my knowledge (NFHS or NCAA), and the only place I know it exists is in the...wait for it...(sarcasm on) my favorite book of all time: the IAABO Officials' Manual, and only in the signal chart.

I personally say "backcourt" or "backcourt violation" while making the signal.
It is a perfectly accurate description of the play in all cases I can think of...you have to get the ball over the division line and then go back to have the violation. It isn't necessarily verbose enough to tell the full story but neither is "backcourt".

As for what is listed in the books, that doesn't stop people from reporting illegal use of hands as "hits", at least around here. I don't and think it sounds silly, but it is common, particularly in the college crowd. And in a lot if cases, "hits" is not actually correct.

Last edited by Camron Rust; Wed Dec 11, 2013 at 07:37pm.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 11, 2013, 08:04pm
(Something hilarious)
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: These United States
Posts: 1,162
Quote:
Originally Posted by Camron Rust View Post
It is a perfectly accurate description of the play in all cases I can think of...you have to get the ball over the division line and then go back to have the violation. It isn't necessarily verbose enough to tell the full story but neither is "backcourt".

As for what is listed in the books, that doesn't stop people from reporting illegal use of hands as "hits", at least around here. I don't and think it sounds silly, but it is common, particularly in the college crowd. And in a lot if cases, "hits" is not actually correct.
"Hit" is in the NCAA-W manual, fwiw. "HitS" sounds plain stupid to me, personally.

Examples of backcourt violations that don't fit "over and back":

1) A thrown-in ball that is player-controlled in the frontcourt that then obtains backcourt status (last touched by A, first touched by A) never necessarily went "over the division line" before going "back."

2) A jump ball that ends which then immediately results in a backcourt violation hasn't necessarily crossed the division line at all.
__________________
I can't remember the last time I wasn't at least kind-of tired.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Thu Dec 12, 2013, 12:13am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: In the offseason.
Posts: 12,263
Quote:
Originally Posted by HawkeyeCubP View Post
"Hit" is in the NCAA-W manual, fwiw. "HitS" sounds plain stupid to me, personally.

Examples of backcourt violations that don't fit "over and back":

1) A thrown-in ball that is player-controlled in the frontcourt that then obtains backcourt status (last touched by A, first touched by A) never necessarily went "over the division line" before going "back."
You mean being in the frontcourt is not over the line but is behind the line?????

You're going to have to explain that one.

It is "being" over the line, not "going" over the line.

Quote:
Originally Posted by HawkeyeCubP View Post

2) A jump ball that ends which then immediately results in a backcourt violation hasn't necessarily crossed the division line at all.
Same thing. I have no idea how the ball can gain FC status (which is necessary to have a violation) without it ever being "over" the line by nature of contact with the floor or in contact with a player who is in the FC (noting the definition of ball location).
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Thu Dec 12, 2013, 12:30am
(Something hilarious)
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: These United States
Posts: 1,162
Quote:
Originally Posted by Camron Rust
You mean being in the frontcourt is not over the line but is behind the line?????
No. I'm simply saying the ball doesn't have to cross the division line to gain FC status in a thrown-in ball from literally half of the possible locations for a throw-in.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Camron Rust
It is "being" over the line, not "going" over the line.
I suppose that's another way of looking at it, but again, not wholly accurate in some situations, such as the violation immediately following a jump ball.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Camron Rust
Same thing. I have no idea how the ball can gain FC status (which is necessary to have a violation) without it ever being "over" the line by nature of contact with the floor or in contact with a player who is in the FC (noting the definition of ball location).
An airborne player can give the ball status.
__________________
I can't remember the last time I wasn't at least kind-of tired.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 11, 2013, 08:06pm
(Something hilarious)
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: These United States
Posts: 1,162
A quick forum search will reveal

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ed Maeder View Post
Which brings up the question. Why do we verbalize the nature of the foul when reporting when the officials manual only calls for a visual signal.
that this has been discussed multiple times before, and I don't remember there being a clear consensus.
__________________
I can't remember the last time I wasn't at least kind-of tired.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 11, 2013, 07:55pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: In the offseason.
Posts: 12,263
Quote:
Originally Posted by HawkeyeCubP View Post
I'd stay away from the phrase "over and back," and try to just use rule book terminology when discussing this type of play/possible violation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Camron Rust View Post
Why? This one accurately describes the situation....unlike over-the-back. I don't think I know of a single official that says anything other than over-and-back.
Quote:
Originally Posted by HawkeyeCubP View Post
Huh. Maybe this is a just me thing, then. I think it's an antiquated term that sounds very junior-high-official. It's not always an accurate term for what that violation is, it's not listed in the rule or case books to my knowledge (NFHS or NCAA), and the only place I know it exists is in the...wait for it...(sarcasm on) my favorite book of all time: the IAABO Officials' Manual, and only in the signal chart.

I personally say "backcourt" or "backcourt violation" while making the signal.
It is in the NFHS signal chart too...so I believe that makes it official.

And I challenge you to create a "backcourt" violation where over-and-back is not accurate.

I could probably, if I tried, come up with more reasons why backcourt is less accurate or less complete than over and back versus the reverse.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 11, 2013, 08:07pm
NFHS Official
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 1,734
Quote:
Originally Posted by HawkeyeCubP View Post
Huh. Maybe this is a just me thing, then. I think it's an antiquated term that sounds very junior-high-official. It's not always an accurate term for what that violation is, it's not listed in the rule or case books to my knowledge (NFHS or NCAA), and the only place I know it exists is in the...wait for it...(sarcasm on) my favorite book of all time: the IAABO Officials' Manual, and only in the signal chart.

I personally say "backcourt" or "backcourt violation" while making the signal.

Pleas look at the signal chart, which is in the rules book, Number 22. The caption under the picture.....

"Over and Back"
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 11, 2013, 07:04pm
Esteemed Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 23,397
Oh Oh Oh (Arnold Horshack, 1975) ...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Camron Rust View Post
I don't think I know of a single official that says anything other than over-and-back.
Me. My call is always, "Backcourt", and has been for thirty-three years.
__________________
"For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life." (John 3:16)

“I was in prison and you came to visit me.” (Matthew 25:36)
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 11, 2013, 07:38pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 18,193
Quote:
Originally Posted by Camron Rust View Post
Why? This one accurately describes the situation....unlike over-the-back. I don't think I know of a single official that says anything other than over-and-back.
I say "back court".
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 11, 2013, 07:40pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: In the offseason.
Posts: 12,263
Quote:
Originally Posted by bob jenkins View Post
I say "back court".
Sounds like it is regional.
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old Thu Dec 12, 2013, 11:45am
Rich's Avatar
Get away from me, Steve.
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 15,794
Quote:
Originally Posted by Camron Rust View Post
Why? This one accurately describes the situation....unlike over-the-back. I don't think I know of a single official that says anything other than over-and-back.
Backcourt violation for me.
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old Thu Dec 12, 2013, 11:53am
Administrator
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Toledo, Ohio, U.S.A.
Posts: 8,143
I have always said "backcourt". And while I have an intense dislike for an official referring to a PCF or TCF in NFHS and NCAA Rules as an "offensive" foul, I do not get to hung when an official uses the term "over and back" to describe a "backcourt violation".

That said I encourage officials both young and old (like me) to use correct (rules book terminology) terminology when talking with other officials and especially with players and coaches (and fans and "talking heads") because it is a way of educating them about the rules of the game.

MTD, Sr.
__________________
Mark T. DeNucci, Sr.
Trumbull Co. (Warren, Ohio) Bkb. Off. Assn.
Wood Co. (Bowling Green, Ohio) Bkb. Off. Assn.
Ohio Assn. of Basketball Officials
International Assn. of Approved Bkb. Officials
Ohio High School Athletic Association
Toledo, Ohio
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Back court on throw in? IamKip Basketball 11 Mon Oct 22, 2007 01:29pm
Over and back throw-in location? rfp Basketball 4 Fri Mar 18, 2005 06:28pm
over and back throw in grk10 Basketball 10 Sun Jan 19, 2003 09:07am
Back Court violation on a throw in Jeff the Ref Basketball 21 Tue Dec 10, 2002 10:57pm
throw in after back court akingsfan Basketball 2 Sun Feb 06, 2000 12:55am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:42pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1