The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Fri Oct 04, 2013, 08:04am
Adam's Avatar
Keeper of the HAMMER
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: MST
Posts: 27,190
Quote:
Originally Posted by BillyMac View Post
For sake of moving this discussion along, I will reluctantly admit that this is not a backyard, or sandlot, variety do-over.

However, to my other point, 10.1.8 does back up my contention that the NFHS feels that high school varsity basketball players can become confused during a throwin situation (in this case a very specific situation) and (in this very specific case) that confusion can result in rules being "bent". If the NFHS feels that high school varsity players can become confused during a throwin, then why can't some admit that seventh graders can also become confused during a throwin. I do not expect others to allow a do-over, that's the "When in Rome" aspect of this, but I would think that they could just admit that some seventh graders, especially the "leftover" seventh graders that play in my Catholic middle school "junior varsity" league, can, early in the season (we have a no press rule in place during the first half of the season), become confused during a throwin.
First of all, this case play does not result in rules being bent. The sportsmanship rule is all about intent, and this case play follows the rules to the letter. Remember, if a DOG warning had already been issued, this would result in a technical foul. The case play is merely giving guidance on when to call an unsportsmanlike player technical for delaying the game.

No rules are being bent.

Second of all, no one said 7th graders won't get confused. Some are saying they'd be less lenient than others; and frankly, I think the differences expressed are way overblown and most of us here would rule the same way given the same set of players.
__________________
Sprinkles are for winners.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Fri Oct 04, 2013, 08:14am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,262
Let's say we determine it was not due to confusion and that A already has a DOG warning.

Do we assess two technicals? One for a) and one for b)?
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Fri Oct 04, 2013, 06:00pm
Esteemed Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 23,461
No One ???

Quote:
Originally Posted by Adam View Post
... no one said 7th graders won't get confused.
"We think they cannot handle what not to do on a throw-in?"

"Basketball how hard is it to know the ball has to be throw-in out of bounds? Sounds simple to me."

"That might be the case is some places, but not in the places that I am familiar"
__________________
"For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life." (John 3:16)

“I was in prison and you came to visit me.” (Matthew 25:36)

Last edited by BillyMac; Fri Oct 04, 2013 at 06:19pm.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Here's an easy one Mark Padgett Basketball 4 Mon Nov 12, 2007 11:26pm
Two easy ones, maybe, we'll see Chess Ref Basketball 9 Tue Jun 05, 2007 01:15pm
Easy one IRISHMAFIA Softball 13 Fri Jul 07, 2006 12:40pm
Easy with the T's???? PIAA REF Basketball 53 Tue Jul 04, 2006 06:17pm
Another Easy Play [probably too easy for this board] whiskers_ump Softball 14 Sat Mar 09, 2002 04:59pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:03am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1