Michigan-Louisville clip rebounding no call (6:51 2nd half)

[#olderthanilook]

Video is fairly conclusive....the post player traveled at least twice.

The first travel occurs when his back is to the bucket and lifts both feet before starting a dribble. The second is when he falls backward trying to avoid good defensive position by the Michigan big blocking his direct path to the rim.

AND, how about #7 for L'ville running out of bounds along the baseline (to avoid his own player, no less) just prior to the L'ville big traveling the first time?

Hello.

[Camron Rust]

Originally Posted by #olderthanilook

AND, how about #7 for L'ville running out of bounds along the baseline (to avoid his own player, no less) ...?

Hello.

Your point?

That is not illegal at the NCAA unless the ball is thrown to #7 as he returns inbounds.

(That is the way the NFHS rule should be)

[#olderthanilook]

Originally Posted by Camron Rust

Your point?

That is not illegal at the NCAA unless the ball is thrown to #7 as he returns inbounds.

(That is the way the NFHS rule should be)

I'm just a NFHS peon. Hence, my surprise that a player can simply run off the playing court for no apparent reason other than to gain an advantage during a live ball.

Didn't know the NCAA didn't concern itsself with players leaving and re-entering the court on their own terms.

Interesting, to say the least.

[Adam]

Originally Posted by #olderthanilook

I'm just a NFHS peon. Hence, my surprise that a player can simply run off the playing court for no apparent reason other than to gain an advantage during a live ball.

Didn't know the NCAA didn't concern itsself with players leaving and re-entering the court on their own terms.

Interesting, to say the least.

They do concern themselves with it, but it's only penalized if the departed player is the first to touch or receive the ball once he is no longer departed.

[Camron Rust]

Originally Posted by Adam

They do concern themselves with it, but it's only penalized if the departed player is the first to touch or receive the ball once he is no longer departed.

Precisely, they deal with it when it has an effect....the way it should be.

[JRutledge]

Originally Posted by #olderthanilook

I'm just a NFHS peon. Hence, my surprise that a player can simply run off the playing court for no apparent reason other than to gain an advantage during a live ball.

Didn't know the NCAA didn't concern itsself with players leaving and re-entering the court on their own terms.

Interesting, to say the least.

Not an issue of not being concerned, the rules are not the same.

Peace

[#olderthanilook]

Originally Posted by JRutledge

Not an issue of not being concerned, the rules are not the same.

Peace

In other words, they aren't concerned about it or there would be a rule in place.

[JetMetFan]

Originally Posted by #olderthanilook

AND, how about #7 for L'ville running out of bounds along the baseline (to avoid his own player, no less) just prior to the L'ville big traveling the first time?

If there was a #7 out there for Louisville the crew was having more problems than we thought.

[#olderthanilook]

Originally Posted by JetMetFan

If there was a #7 out there for Louisville the crew was having more problems than we thought.

It looks like Smith, but I'm not enough of a fan to know his number. Maybe he's #1???

[Adam]

Originally Posted by #olderthanilook

It looks like Smith, but I'm not enough of a fan to know his number. Maybe he's #1???

The point is, it can't be #7. It's not a legal number in NCAA (and NFHS) rules.