Duke-Louisville no call travel clip (Dieng 2nd half)

[JetMetFan]

Originally Posted by OKREF

13:46. Travel or not?

Pretty clear travel to me, but I want to hear what JRut says.

Does anyone think there might be a foul 7 seconds into this clip (13:49 game time)?

[OKREF]

Travel. I thought it was a travel when I saw it live also.

[JugglingReferee]

Looks like a travel. Re: the foul, I don't see a definite foul because of the camera angle, but the play is suspect for a foul, that's for sure.

[referee99]

Play on.

[JRutledge]

I think the issue is whether the officials think there is control. And control is certainly at issue here. I was thinking travel when I saw this at first but can understand why it was not called.

Peace

[ballgame99]

I like the no call. Possession occurs as his momentum is rolling over (helped by a defender).

[Raymond]

Originally Posted by ballgame99

I like the no call. Possession occurs as his momentum is rolling over (helped by a defender).

You are only permitted to roll over with the ball during a slide. On this play if you have judged the Dieng rolled over with the ball then you have to rule a travelling violation.

[JeffM]

I thought it was a travel because Dieng rolled away from the Duke player. There were probably a couple fouls that the L passed on prior to the ball becoming loose.

[Camron Rust]

He almost made it 360 degrees in that roll. That is a travel.

[Larks]

Originally Posted by jrutledge

i think the issue is whether the officials think there is control. And control is certainly at issue here. I was thinking travel when i saw this at first but can understand why it was not called.

Peace

+1