The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Thu Mar 21, 2013, 06:37pm
Rich's Avatar
Get away from me, Steve.
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 15,767
Louisville / NCAT video request (added)

Charge called at 8:14, 1st half. I'm guessing when the L sees this, he'll wish he had it over again. 2 feet down, but the upper body seems to be still sliding forward.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Thu Mar 21, 2013, 06:40pm
Rich's Avatar
Get away from me, Steve.
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 15,767
While we're at it, the backcourt violation called at 7:46, 1st half.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Fri Mar 22, 2013, 04:57am
APG APG is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 5,889


__________________
Chaos isn't a pit. Chaos is a ladder. Many who try to climb it fail and never get to try again. The fall breaks them. And some, given a chance to climb, they refuse. They cling to the realm, or the gods, or love. Illusions.

Only the ladder is real. The climb is all there is.

Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Fri Mar 22, 2013, 05:05am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 57
Yeah both were bad decisions. No LGP on the block/charge in the first vid. On the 2nd one the trail should have called the foul when the defender knocked the player into the backcourt.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Fri Mar 22, 2013, 07:38am
Courageous When Prudent
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Hampton Roads, VA
Posts: 14,839
1st play: Should have been a block but it wasn't the worst call I've ever seen. Sometimes we get 'em wrong.

2nd play: Should have been a foul. But it wasn't even a BC violation, no part of A1 was in the backcourt when he regained possession.
__________________
A-hole formerly known as BNR
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Fri Mar 22, 2013, 07:47am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,081
Play 1 should have been a "no call" & Play 2 should be a foul, but no B/C violation, maybe hard to see this from the position the new trail is, but, the heel does not touch in the backcourt.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Fri Mar 22, 2013, 07:50am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 18,016
Quote:
Originally Posted by KMBReferee View Post
Yeah both were bad decisions. No LGP on the block/charge in the first vid. On the 2nd one the trail should have called the foul when the defender knocked the player into the backcourt.
Yep -- the foul caused an illegal dribble, and then I don't have the ball ever reaching the BC (but this part is very close).
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Fri Mar 22, 2013, 07:52am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,081
Quote:
Originally Posted by BadNewsRef View Post
1st play: Should have been a block but it wasn't the worst call I've ever seen. Sometimes we get 'em wrong.
Yes, looking at it a second time, this should have been a block. And, Yes we sometimes get 'em wrong.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Fri Mar 22, 2013, 07:58am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,081
Quote:
Originally Posted by bob jenkins View Post
Yep -- the foul caused an illegal dribble, and then I don't have the ball ever reaching the BC (but this part is very close).
I don't see an illegal dribble...you could make a case for a travel as the right foot (pivot) is off the ground when he starts his dribble
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Fri Mar 22, 2013, 08:04am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 18,016
Quote:
Originally Posted by Indianaref View Post
I don't see an illegal dribble...you could make a case for a travel as the right foot (pivot) is off the ground when he starts his dribble
yes, that's the part I saw. Just misspoke.
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Fri Mar 22, 2013, 08:59am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Denver Colorado
Posts: 736
Interesting

Play 2 has a lot going on. Looks like a foul. However, if we pass on the foul, two things come to mind. If the ball leaving the offensive players hand is the start of a dribble, then we have a travel.

If the offensive player loses control of the ball and the ball hitting the ground is not the start of a dribble, he establishes backcourt status and doesn't regain frontcourt status before dribbling the ball. Team control maintained throughout...backcourt violation.
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Fri Mar 22, 2013, 09:02am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 18,016
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toren View Post
he establishes backcourt status and doesn't regain frontcourt status before dribbling the ball.
Yes he does regain FC status -- foot on floor in FC, nothing touching the BC before he touches the ball.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old Fri Mar 22, 2013, 09:06am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Denver Colorado
Posts: 736
Quote:
Originally Posted by bob jenkins View Post
Yes he does regain FC status -- foot on floor in FC, nothing touching the BC before he touches the ball.
It's close, I see back foot touching in backcourt at time of touching of the ball.
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old Fri Mar 22, 2013, 09:35am
Rich's Avatar
Get away from me, Steve.
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 15,767
Quote:
Originally Posted by BadNewsRef View Post
1st play: Should have been a block but it wasn't the worst call I've ever seen. Sometimes we get 'em wrong.

2nd play: Should have been a foul. But it wasn't even a BC violation, no part of A1 was in the backcourt when he regained possession.
On the first one, I think the L was still moving and picked up the defender late. When that happens, we tend to go with the charge. I'm not ripping the guy, I just am looking at this to see what I can learn from it.
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old Fri Mar 22, 2013, 11:06am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 179
I'm pretty sure that none of us would have got that backcourt violation call correct. Even as I stop the play when the ball touches the hand it is nearly impossible to tell if that back foot is still on the ground or not.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Video request: OVC Title game Murray St. vs. Belmont (Video Added) JRutledge Basketball 8 Sat Mar 23, 2013 06:18pm
Louisville @ Notre Dame, Rich's Video Request #2 JetMetFan Basketball 42 Wed Feb 13, 2013 11:49pm
Louisville @ ND, Rich's video request #1 JetMetFan Basketball 25 Wed Feb 13, 2013 09:18am
Louisville @ ND, Rich's video request #s 3 & 4 JetMetFan Basketball 12 Tue Feb 12, 2013 03:20pm
Can a pitcher request the mound be raked, dirt added, or repaired during an inning? eb_baseballguy Baseball 5 Sat Jun 21, 2008 10:03pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:44pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1