Real mess up????

[APG]

Two things:

As Welpe pointed out, the AP and POI aren't exclusive. The point of interruption includes using the arrow in certain situations.

Second, this play is covered in case book play 8.6.1.

[rawhi1]

I understand your reference to this casebook play. You were using situation C. But in the op he0said the defense rebounded the ball. That could be one player stepping in and rebounding while everybody stands still then starts looking around. You would need to know if all or several from both teams agressively rebounded. From the info provided especially if lead administering FT made mistake I would go with AP. But I was not there

[APG]

Originally Posted by rawhi1

I understand your reference to this casebook play. You were using situation C. But in the op he0said the defense rebounded the ball. That could be one player stepping in and rebounding while everybody stands still then starts looking around. You would need to know if all or several from both teams agressively rebounded. From the info provided especially if lead administering FT made mistake I would go with AP. But I was not there

Umm...8.6.1 (there is no 8.6.1 Situation C) covers this exact play. The OP would just have to decide whether to one/both teams were disadvantaged by the wrong information or if neither tam was and go from there.

[rawhi1]

I was making reference to the comment with the IW. The person with the reference to 8.6.1 was dead on. Good job!

[rawhi1]

I misspoke. But there is an 8.6.1 a,b,and c. I made reference to C not situation. That should have been understood if you actually read it.

[Welpe]

Originally Posted by rawhi1

That should have been understood if you actually read it.

Quite frankly, I have no idea what you've been saying these past few posts.

[APG]

Originally Posted by rawhi1

I misspoke. But there is an 8.6.1 a,b,and c. I made reference to C not situation. That should have been understood if you actually read it.

I'm looking at my case book from last year and this year's one...there is no 8.6.1 Situation C.

[maven]

8.6.1 SITUATION: A1 is about to attempt the first of a one-and-one free-throw
situation. The administering official steps in and erroneously informs players that
two shots will be taken. A1's first attempt is unsuccessful. The missed shot is
rebounded by: (a) B1, with all other players motionless in anticipation of another
throw; (b) A2, with all other players motionless in anticipation of another throw;
or (c) B2, with several players from both teams attempting to secure the rebound.
The officials recognize their error at this point. RULING: In (a) and (b), the official's
error clearly put one team at a disadvantage (players stood motionless and
didn't attempt to rebound). Play should be whistled dead immediately and
resumed using the alternating-possession procedure. In (c), both teams made an
attempt to rebound despite the official's error and had an equal opportunity to
gain possession of the rebound. Play should continue. (2-3)

[bob jenkins]

Originally Posted by rawhi1

I was making reference to the comment with the IW. The person with the reference to 8.6.1 was dead. Good job!

I'm the only one who mentioned IW, I think. I stand by my post.

[rawhi1]

I appreciatiate your candor. But from the OP u really don't know whether all were hellbent on getting a rebound in which you would be right or whether 1 defensive man stepped in and rebounded and everybody froze and a IW. Either way 8.6.1 gets it right. Enjoyed the debate. !