Correctable Error?

[just another ref]

Originally Posted by Camron Rust

I say they gave a two part penalty for one infraction. They got the penalty wrong for one infraction. Two fouls with two penalties is quite different.

Is it?

Originally Posted by OKREF

1 for the and 1 and 2 for the intentional foul.

The OP specifies two separate free throw sets. Two penalties, one two part penalty, what's the difference? Either, of course is equally wrong.

[Camron Rust]

Originally Posted by just another ref

Is it?



The OP specifies two separate free throw sets. Two penalties, one two part penalty, what's the difference? Either, of course is equally wrong.

Show me where an "and 1 foul" is defined in the book and I might agree with you. Of course you can't. There was only 1 foul despite how it was described or how it was called.

[just another ref]

Originally Posted by Camron Rust

Show me where an "and 1 foul" is defined in the book and I might agree with you. Of course you can't.

That's the whole point. There is no such thing. Yet they awarded a free throw for it. First. Followed by two more free throws.

That's why the first one doesn't count.

[OKREF]

Originally Posted by just another ref

That's the whole point. There is no such thing. Yet they awarded a free throw for it. First. Followed by two more free throws.

That's why the first one doesn't count.

I tend to agree here. The first free throw was the one that was not merited and I believe that is the one that can be corrected.