2 violations

[MD Longhorn]

Originally Posted by OKREF

The NFHS rule book disagrees with Newton and says an AP throw in occurs when there ia a simultaneous violation.

Newton Who?

[Rich]

Originally Posted by OKREF

The NFHS rule book disagrees with Newton and says an AP throw in occurs when there ia a simultaneous violation.

He says Einstein and you quote Newton.

Simultaneous as mentioned in the rule book is a rulebook term and doesn't necessarily mean the actions occurred at exactly the same time -- for example, a simultaneous violation on a free throw.

[bob jenkins]

Originally Posted by OKREF

6-4-3. C

Ah -- thanks.

I guess I should read the rule book more.

So, the answer to the test question in the OP is apparently "yes" (unless they are testing "double violation" vs. "simultaneous violation")

[Rich]

Originally Posted by bob jenkins

Ah -- thanks.

I guess I should read the rule book more.

So, the answer to the test question in the OP is apparently "yes" (unless they are testing "double violation" vs. "simultaneous violation")

Doing a quick search on the rule book app for the phrases double violation and simultaneous violation, it appears that the NFHS uses both phrases. Almost randomly.

Don't feel I learned anything, but it's interesting nonetheless.

[Freddy]

Originally Posted by bob jenkins

I guess I should read the rule book more.

This session of the "Always Listen to Bob" Raving Admiration Society (ALBRAS) is temporarily recessed while we figure all this out. No, don't panic. There might be a reasonable explanation for it. He might have hit his head on something.

[Scuba_ref]

Too late, I have already panicked

[just another ref]

If the choices are simultaneous violations and the AP arrow or decide which one came first, I expect most of us will still listen to Bob.

[OKREF]

Originally Posted by just another ref

If the choices are simultaneous violations and the AP arrow or decide which one came first, I expect most of us will still listen to Bob.

I agree. I have never had a simultaneous violation. Someones whistle was first. Just pointing out the book does say this could happen.

[ODog]

Originally Posted by PP

Referee rules a double violation, jump ball. The team with the alternating possession arrow gets the ball out of bounds. Are the officials correct?

No, they should have ruled held ball.

[Rich]

Originally Posted by ODog

No, they should have ruled held ball.

Actually, it's neither a jump ball or a held ball. It's a situation which is resolved by using the alternating possession arrow.

[Sharpshooternes]

Originally Posted by BillyMac

Is there such a thing as a a double violation? Wait? Should I look this up in my rulebook, and casebook, first, or can I just ask the question? I sure hope that my question doesn't get me in trouble.

Thanks Billy Mac, you are a fine example of forward thinking and progress on this forum.