throw-in

SAK · #1 (**permalink**) Sat Dec 08, 2012, 05:55pm

T/F During a throw-in, B1 has violated if thrower A1 passes the ball into the court and it is first touched by B1 who has one foot on a boundary line.

Thinking true but this is not a throw-in violation merely an OOB violation.

BktBallRef · #2 (**permalink**) Sat Dec 08, 2012, 05:57pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by SAK

Thinking true but this is not a throw-in violation merely an OOB violation.

Why does it matter which it is? It's still true.

SAK · #3 (**permalink**) Sat Dec 08, 2012, 06:00pm

Going through the test, and some of the questions seem to make me think because I am not on the court. Know how to administer the rule.

BktBallRef · #4 (**permalink**) Sat Dec 08, 2012, 06:02pm

Again, what does it matter what type of violation it is? It's still a violation so the answer is true.

KyKatsFan · #5 (**permalink**) Sat Dec 08, 2012, 07:53pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by BktBallRef

Again, what does it matter what type of violation it is? It's still a violation so the answer is true.

The difference could be the throw in spot location and whether or not the thrower in can run the end line.
If considered a throw in violation, reset the original throw in conditions. If just OOB, designated spot would be in effect and possibly in a new location.

just another ref · #6 (**permalink**) Sat Dec 08, 2012, 08:05pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by KyKatsFan

The difference could be the throw in spot location and whether or not the thrower in can run the end line.
If considered a throw in violation, reset the original throw in conditions. If just OOB, designated spot would be in effect and possibly in a new location.

None of which makes a difference when the two choices are true or false.

KyKatsFan · #7 (**permalink**) Sat Dec 08, 2012, 08:39pm

I was answering your question as to what difference it makes... and I agree that is doesn't change the T/F answer.

Adam · #8 (**permalink**) Sat Dec 08, 2012, 08:55pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by KyKatsFan

If considered a throw in violation, reset the original throw in conditions.

??

A throw in violation on B?

Camron Rust · #9 (**permalink**) Sat Dec 08, 2012, 08:55pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by just another ref

None of which makes a difference when the two choices are true or false.

Maybe not, but trying to understand more than just T/F is certainly admirable.

BktBallRef · #10 (**permalink**) Sat Dec 08, 2012, 10:08pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by KyKatsFan

The difference could be the throw in spot location and whether or not the thrower in can run the end line.
If considered a throw in violation, reset the original throw in conditions. If just OOB, designated spot would be in effect and possibly in a new location.

That has nothing to do with whether an exam question is True or False.

Sharpshooternes · #11 (**permalink**) Sun Dec 09, 2012, 02:11am

Quote:

Originally Posted by KyKatsFan

The difference could be the throw in spot location and whether or not the thrower in can run the end line.
If considered a throw in violation, reset the original throw in conditions. If just OOB, designated spot would be in effect and possibly in a new location.

Also, if the original throw in in the OP is an AP throw in, does the arrow change or stay the same?

BillyMac · #12 (**permalink**) Sun Dec 09, 2012, 09:48am

Quote:

Originally Posted by SAK

During a throw-in, B1 has violated if thrower A1 passes the ball into the court and it is first touched by B1 who has one foot on a boundary line.

Maybe the test is trying to confuse old timers. This used to be a throwin violation on A1.

That's my observation on the possible rationale behind this test question.

For those who would like a shorter, Twitter (less than 140 characters) version of the answer: True.

BktBallRef · #13 (**permalink**) Sun Dec 09, 2012, 09:52am

Quote:

Originally Posted by BillyMac

Maybe the test is trying to confuse old timers. This used to be a throwin violation on A1.

When was this ever a violation by A? Rule reference please?

BillyMac · #14 (**permalink**) Sun Dec 09, 2012, 09:57am

Quote:

Originally Posted by SAK

During a throw-in, B1 has violated if thrower A1 passes the ball into the court and it is first touched by B1 who has one foot on a boundary line.

Quote:

Originally Posted by BktBallRef

When was this ever a violation by A? Rule reference please?

Yes, about twenty-five, or thirty years, ago. The throwin violation was for A1 not throwing the ball directly to a player on the court. Team B would then get possession with a new throwin at the spot of the original throwin. It's true. It's true.

I'll let Mark T. DeNucci, Sr. climb up the stairs into his cold, attic, library to get the proper citations.

BktBallRef · #15 (**permalink**) Sun Dec 09, 2012, 10:01am

Quote:

Originally Posted by BillyMac

Yes, about twenty-five, or thirty years, ago. The throwin violation was for A1 not throwing the ball directly to someone on the court. Team B would then get possession with a new throwin at the spot of the original throwin. It's true. It's true.

I'll let Mark T. DeNucci, Sr. climb up the stairs into his cold, attic, library to get the proper citations.

I hope he does. I've been watching basketball since 1970 and officiating it since 1985 and I don't ever recall that being the rule.

Me thinks you didn't know the rules twenty-five or thirty years ago.

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Where's the next throw in?	stiffler3492	Basketball	3	Sun Dec 18, 2011 12:56am
Throw-in	Clark Kent	Basketball	1	Wed Dec 10, 2008 11:41am
throw-in after double personal during free throw	closetotheedge	Basketball	26	Mon Dec 01, 2008 02:39am
3 man mechanic on sideline throw in below free throw line extended!!!!	jritchie	Basketball	10	Tue Nov 01, 2005 02:43pm
Throw-in spot after throw-in violation	zebraman	Basketball	6	Sun Dec 12, 2004 08:09pm