|
|||
You keep going back to the pretty lights.
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'” West Houston Mike |
|
|||
Quote:
Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble." ----------------------------------------------------------- Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010) |
|
|||
Quote:
VSC: Yes. HSC: Yes sir. We've both got... R: OK, see ya next time. Thanks guys. HSC: 59-59, wait, where's he going? VSC: I don't know. Should we stop him? HSC: I don't know, maybe he's got to get something before overtime... VSC: Weird. Hey, where'd you go to get your shirt?
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'” West Houston Mike Last edited by MD Longhorn; Thu Dec 06, 2012 at 03:30pm. |
|
|||
Quote:
The scorer and timer need to be trusted to do their duties. If they don't, then the school administration and the state office will sort it out. I'm not going over and looking at the book before leaving. Edit: Allow me to be clear--the referee does have a duty to "check and approve" the score at the end of each half. What constitutes this is not clearly defined (perhaps one could contend that leaving the visual confines amounts to this, but that is doubtful even with that text), but I've never heard anyone state that it means physically looking at the book oneself. The NCAA has a protocol which merely involves making eye contact with the scorer and then moving off the court unless the scorer alerts the R to a problem. Last edited by Nevadaref; Thu Dec 06, 2012 at 04:50pm. |
|
|||
+1
__________________
I swear, Gus, you'd argue with a possum. It'd be easier than arguing with you, Woodrow. Lonesome Dove |
|
|||
No. I'm going by the fact that the scorer has indicated that they have the same thing as the pretty lights. If they later, after the officials leave the floor, determine that they made a mistake, it can't be corrected.
__________________
Owner/Developer of RefTown.com Commissioner, Portland Basketball Officials Association |
|
|||
So since "it can't be corrected," what do you wish to now let stand--what the scorer told/indicated to the officials or what was actually written down in the official book by the scorer?
|
|
|||
Let me ask this:
At the expiration of time in the 4th quarter the scoreboard shows 59-59. Prior to the jump ball to begin the extra period, the scorer counts up the points recorded for the 4th quarter in his book. He finds that Team A only has 58 points and that the scoreboard operator must have mistakenly posted an extra point sometime during the final quarter, and alerts the referee. Team A had possession for the last 38 seconds of the 4th quarter and missed a try for goal at the horn. Team A coach states that he would not have held the ball for the final 38 seconds of the quarter if he had known that his team was behind by one. Make your ruling as the R. |
|
|||
Quote:
I don't see how that applies to this case. In this case, the scorer made an error in indicating that score was not tied...we don't go over to verify that they are recording/reading the results correctly. The officials left the floor based on the scorer's validation of the final score not being tied. Realizing later that it wasn't tied is no different than realizing they didn't record something properly.
__________________
Owner/Developer of RefTown.com Commissioner, Portland Basketball Officials Association |
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
Quote:
Quote:
|
|
|||
Quote:
When the officials leave the court approving a score, their jurisdiction ends. That much is clear. It doesn't matter if the score they approve is subsequently found to be inaccurate. It doesn't matter which score is official if they declare another score to be the final. In doing so, they have, even if they are wrong in their conclusion, effectively declared one to be correct and the other to be incorrect...which is something the referee has the authority to do. If the state wants to reopen the game and declare that it wasn't actually over they can certainly do so but from the perspective of the officials, the game is over as they approved it. Just as you play OT once you start it even if the official book said the game was not tied...you don't go back and cancel OT. Likewise, once the officials leave the court, you don't go back and continue the game. Not sure why you're dragging this on. The game is over.
__________________
Owner/Developer of RefTown.com Commissioner, Portland Basketball Officials Association Last edited by Camron Rust; Fri Dec 07, 2012 at 03:11am. |
|
|||
Quote:
The scenario is this: At the end of the game the scoreboard reads 60-59 and the official scorebook reads 59-59. The scorer has failed, for whatever reason, to make the officials aware of the discrepancy before they leave the visual confines of the court and thereby approving the final score. Again, we all agree that, barring intervention from the appropriate state authority, the game is over. As far as I can tell, you maintain the final score is 60-59. I, NR and others maintain the final score is 59-59. It appears to me that you think the officials are approving the score on the scoreboard (thus MD's stating you go back to the lights) rather than approving the running score in the official scorebook. |
Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
OT - final score 75-0! | Mark Padgett | Basketball | 9 | Sat Nov 21, 2009 04:02pm |
Final score approved? | referee99 | Basketball | 12 | Sun Jan 25, 2009 04:52pm |
Final score 67-1! | Mark Padgett | Basketball | 8 | Fri Mar 09, 2007 08:07pm |
Final score 112 - 14 ... in a tournament! | Mark Padgett | Basketball | 17 | Mon Feb 19, 2007 02:50pm |
What's the final score? | John Robertson | Softball | 34 | Tue Aug 29, 2006 09:55am |