Player's Uniforms

[tjones1]

Which statement regarding player's numbers in the scorebook at ten minutes before game starting time is true?

a) Both 0 and 00 can be worn during the game.
b) Players with identical numbers result in a technical foul
c) Incorrect number in score book can be changed without penalty
d) all of the above

I said C because 3-2-2 says "after the 10 minutes..."

However, according to the key, that's incorrect which makes B the correct
answer.

Your thoughts?

[jritchie]

I would say they mean at the 10 minute mark, when your supposed to have the book finished, which would actually be after the 10 minute mark or however you want to say it, but both would mean the same thing. So I would go with B also.

[Adam]

What's the rule reference for B? I need to look, but my first thought was it's just something that's not allowed.

[tjones1]

Originally Posted by Adam

What's the rule reference for B? I need to look, but my first thought was it's just something that's not allowed.

10-1-2e

[maven]

Originally Posted by Adam

What's the rule reference for B? I need to look, but my first thought was it's just something that's not allowed.

10-1-2c

If both 0 and 00 are listed in the book, then one of them must be changed in order to comply with 3-4-3d.

Since you're past the 10 minute mark, changing a team member's or player's number is a team technical.

[tjones1]

Originally Posted by maven

10-1-2c

If both 0 and 00 are listed in the book, then one of them must be changed in order to comply with 3-4-3d.

Since you're past the 10 minute mark, changing the a team member's or player's number is a team technical.

That's where I have a problem. It doesn't say we are past the ten minute mark (then I would totally agree it's B); however, it says we are at the ten minute mark.

[Nevadaref]

I would pick B, but you make a good point about "at" versus "after".
I did not notice that detail.
There is an art to test question writing!

[tjones1]

By the way... I sent this to NV late last night via e-mail. I appreciate your late response, NV!

[Adam]

Originally Posted by maven

10-1-2c

If both 0 and 00 are listed in the book, then one of them must be changed in order to comply with 3-4-3d.

Since you're past the 10 minute mark, changing a team member's or player's number is a team technical.

Seems like too much of a stretch for a test question, IMO.

[maven]

Originally Posted by Nevadaref

I would pick B, but you make a good point about "at" versus "after".
I did not notice that detail.
There is an art to test question writing!

I disagree that the distinction between "at" and "after" is relevant. If the clock shows 10:00, then the "10 minute time limit" specified by 10-1-1 and 10-1-2 has elapsed.

Originally Posted by Adam

Seems like too much of a stretch for a test question, IMO.

+1

NFHS has been known to "stretch."

[tjones1]

Originally Posted by maven

I disagree that the distinction between "at" and "after" is relevant. If the clock shows 10:00, then the "10 minute time limit" specified by 10-1-1 and 10-1-2 has elapsed.




+1

NFHS has been known to "stretch."

I disagree. At least 10 minutes >= 10 minutes

[Eastshire]

Originally Posted by tjones1

I disagree. At least 10 minutes >= 10 minutes

If it's discovered at 10:00, is it going to be corrected before 9:59?

[tjones1]

Originally Posted by Eastshire

If it's discovered at 10:00, is it going to be corrected before 9:59?

Probably not...but that's not the question.

[MD Longhorn]

Originally Posted by tjones1

Probably not...but that's not the question.

I think we can feel rather confident that the correct answer to the question does not hinge on the difference between 10:00.000000000000 and the next femtosecond. The question is talking about things the official notices AT the 10:00 mark, when they are supposed to check these things, which is also the moment things must be set by. If they are wrong AT THAT MOMENT, they are wrong according to the rule that they are testing.

[tjones1]

Originally Posted by MD Longhorn

I think we can feel rather confident that the correct answer to the question does not hinge on the difference between 10:00.000000000000 and the next femtosecond. The question is talking about things the official notices AT the 10:00 mark, when they are supposed to check these things, which is also the moment things must be set by. If they are wrong AT THAT MOMENT, they are wrong according to the rule that they are testing.

So at the 10 minute mark Coach A tells you he wants #55 to start instead of #23 -- you are not going to allow it without penalty?