Player's Uniforms

[Adam]

What's the rule reference for B? I need to look, but my first thought was it's just something that's not allowed.

[tjones1]

Originally Posted by Adam

What's the rule reference for B? I need to look, but my first thought was it's just something that's not allowed.

10-1-2e

[maven]

Originally Posted by Adam

What's the rule reference for B? I need to look, but my first thought was it's just something that's not allowed.

10-1-2c

If both 0 and 00 are listed in the book, then one of them must be changed in order to comply with 3-4-3d.

Since you're past the 10 minute mark, changing a team member's or player's number is a team technical.

[tjones1]

Originally Posted by maven

10-1-2c

If both 0 and 00 are listed in the book, then one of them must be changed in order to comply with 3-4-3d.

Since you're past the 10 minute mark, changing the a team member's or player's number is a team technical.

That's where I have a problem. It doesn't say we are past the ten minute mark (then I would totally agree it's B); however, it says we are at the ten minute mark.

[Nevadaref]

I would pick B, but you make a good point about "at" versus "after".
I did not notice that detail.
There is an art to test question writing!

[tjones1]

By the way... I sent this to NV late last night via e-mail. I appreciate your late response, NV!

[maven]

Originally Posted by Nevadaref

I would pick B, but you make a good point about "at" versus "after".
I did not notice that detail.
There is an art to test question writing!

I disagree that the distinction between "at" and "after" is relevant. If the clock shows 10:00, then the "10 minute time limit" specified by 10-1-1 and 10-1-2 has elapsed.

Originally Posted by Adam

Seems like too much of a stretch for a test question, IMO.

+1

NFHS has been known to "stretch."

[tjones1]

Originally Posted by maven

I disagree that the distinction between "at" and "after" is relevant. If the clock shows 10:00, then the "10 minute time limit" specified by 10-1-1 and 10-1-2 has elapsed.




+1

NFHS has been known to "stretch."

I disagree. At least 10 minutes >= 10 minutes

[Eastshire]

Originally Posted by tjones1

I disagree. At least 10 minutes >= 10 minutes

If it's discovered at 10:00, is it going to be corrected before 9:59?

[maven]

Originally Posted by tjones1

I disagree. At least 10 minutes >= 10 minutes

Right. Now count down from 20:00.

[Adam]

Originally Posted by maven

10-1-2c

If both 0 and 00 are listed in the book, then one of them must be changed in order to comply with 3-4-3d.

Since you're past the 10 minute mark, changing a team member's or player's number is a team technical.

Seems like too much of a stretch for a test question, IMO.