AP Throw In Spot

[Camron Rust]

I remember an interpretation sometime back wherein the spot of a the AP throwin for a double violation (maybe it was a double foul) was determined by the location of the violation of that team that did not have the arrow.

In (A), it wouldn't matter, however, since that violation would put A2 in the semi-circle and this the spot for both violations would be on the endline.

In (B), it would matter. If the arrow were pointing to A, it would be an endline throwin since B's violation was in the lane. If the arrow were pointing to B, it would be along the sideline nearest where A2 violated.

[bob jenkins]

Originally Posted by Camron Rust

I remember an interpretation sometime back wherein the spot of a the AP throwin for a double violation (maybe it was a double foul) was determined by the location of the violation of that team that didn't not have the arrow.

In (A), it wouldn't matter, however, since that violation would put A2 in the semi-circle and this the spot for both violations would be on the endline.

In (B), it would matter. If the arrow were pointing to A, it would be an endline throwin since B's violation was in the lane. If the arrow were pointing to B, it would be along the sideline nearest where A2 violated.

That's a good way to resolve it.

Another might be that the initial violation is a delayed dead ball, so it's really the second that causes the AP arrow, so inbound at the spot of the second.

[Adam]

Seems to me the best option is to treat it like POI. Where was the ball?

[billyu2]

Originally Posted by Adam

Seems to me the best option is to treat it like POI. Where was the ball?

That sounds the most logical to me as well.

[bob jenkins]

Originally Posted by billyu2

that sounds the most logical to me as well.

-1

[RookieDude]

Originally Posted by Adam

Seems to me the best option is to treat it like POI. Where was the ball?

ARef...thanks for posting this question today. We had this discussion last night at our meeting. (I said put the ball at the endline...but, I could be confinced otherwise)

Looks like the "heavy hitters" are sort of in the "not sure" mode also.

I do like Cameron's possible interp though.