Multiple free throw violations (part 2)

[BillyMac]

Originally Posted by rockyroad

It is most certainly not a double violation.

Originally Posted by Adam

Double violation.

Originally Posted by bob jerkins

FED 9-1 PENALTY 4c. If a violation by a free thrower follows disconcert ion by an opponent, a substitute free throw shall be awarded.

So it's still considered a double violation, but with a different penalty than the normal, average, "garden variety", double violation? Interesting. I never thought of it in that manner. I've been "schooled".

[rockyroad]

Originally Posted by BillyMac

So it's still considered a double violation, but with a different penalty than the normal, average, "garden variety", double violation? Interesting. I never thought of it in that manner. I've been "schooled".

It is not a double violation..that would result in some consequence other than the shooter getting a substitute throw.

[bob jenkins]

Originally Posted by rockyroad

It is not a double violation..that would result in some consequence other than the shooter getting a substitute throw.

Since there's no definition in the book for "double violation" you both might be right.

[rockyroad]

Originally Posted by bob jenkins

Since there's no definition in the book for "double violation" you both might be right.

Smarty pants.

Fine...simultaneous violation.

Although double violations are talked about in the case book.