|
|||
A Step or Two Further on the Topic . . .
Quote:
A. Might this prompt us to pass on the "ticky-tac" travelling calls that really don't impact play in any significant way? B. Might this way of thinking be more in according with"officiating the defense"? C. Might this especially reward the defense for good, pressure play? D. Would this prompt us to, for sure, catch those travelling violations that would otherwise result in a real advantage over the defense? E. Could this manner of thinking cause us to miss calls we really should be getting? Your comment/input/critique invited as I ruminate over this concept.
__________________
Making Every Effort to Be in the Right Place at the Right Time, Looking at the Right Thing to Make the Right Call |
Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
NHSF "intentional" vs NCAA "flagarent" terminology | Duffman | Basketball | 17 | Wed Feb 08, 2012 10:15pm |
Is "the patient whistle" and "possession consequence" ruining the game? | fiasco | Basketball | 46 | Fri Dec 02, 2011 08:43am |
ABC's "Nightline" examines "worst calls ever" tonight | pizanno | Basketball | 27 | Fri Jul 04, 2008 06:08am |