The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #16 (permalink)  
Old Sun Mar 25, 2012, 10:38pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Denver Colorado
Posts: 736
Clear block on the first one. And like most of you said, I would have stayed away as the L on that one. C has the first best look.

I don't have anything in the Kansas v. UNC game. That's either a PC or a no call, but I liked the way the ref'ing crew handled that one much better. The C held his signal nicely. The L sold his call effectively. I just happen to disagree with the judgement, but I liked everything else.
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old Mon Mar 26, 2012, 12:09am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: In the offseason.
Posts: 12,263
Syr. charge (as called) was a block. It wasn't even that close. The lead was out of position and completely booted it.

The Kansas block (as called) was a charge. The defender was in position a LONG time before the shooter got there.

Both these plays were incorrectly called.
__________________
Owner/Developer of RefTown.com
Commissioner, Portland Basketball Officials Association
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old Mon Mar 26, 2012, 07:43am
Courageous When Prudent
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Hampton Roads, VA
Posts: 14,880
Quote:
Originally Posted by Camron Rust View Post
Syr. charge (as called) was a block. It wasn't even that close. The lead was out of position and completely booted it.

The Kansas block (as called) was a charge. The defender was in position a LONG time before the shooter got there.

Both these plays were incorrectly called.
Agreed on both counts, but at least in the Kansas game the Lead was in position to see the play.
__________________
A-hole formerly known as BNR
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old Mon Mar 26, 2012, 08:37am
Fav theme: Roundball Rock
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Near Dog River (sorta)
Posts: 8,558
Jim B had good reason to be upset - that play was a block. Shouldn't the C have had a whistle on this play? I would bet that the C had a better look at the play than the L did.

I don't know what Jim did to be issued the T. I'd hope that he was given a bit more rope when such a call was kicked.

In the other video, it's about as clear as a PC as possible.
__________________
Pope Francis
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old Mon Mar 26, 2012, 09:12am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Missouri
Posts: 671
Quote:
Originally Posted by JugglingReferee View Post
Jim B had good reason to be upset - that play was a block. Shouldn't the C have had a whistle on this play? I would bet that the C had a better look at the play than the L did.

I don't know what Jim did to be issued the T. I'd hope that he was given a bit more rope when such a call was kicked.

In the other video, it's about as clear as a PC as possible.
Probably couldn't tell, but I would bet Jim B got so upset because the call came from where it did. If that call comes from L does he still get that upset? Guessing no.

On the second one, even through my black and gold colored Mizzou glasses, that is a charge. L was in perfect position for it too.
Reply With Quote
  #21 (permalink)  
Old Mon Mar 26, 2012, 09:33am
Courageous When Prudent
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Hampton Roads, VA
Posts: 14,880
Syracuse play

Quote:
Originally Posted by ballgame99 View Post
Probably couldn't tell, but I would bet Jim B got so upset because the call came from where it did. If that call comes from L does he still get that upset? Guessing no.
...
The call did come from the Lead. But the Lead did not position himself to referee that play.
__________________
A-hole formerly known as BNR
Reply With Quote
  #22 (permalink)  
Old Mon Mar 26, 2012, 10:54am
biz biz is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 221
If I read Boeheim's lips correctly he seemed to be arguing that the defender was in the restricted area, which the replays show that he (barely) wasn't.

My question for the esteemed members of this board is why was this game called so much tighter than every other game this weekend? I think that most of the calls that they made were technically correct, but certainly the threshold of what was a foul and what was merely incidental contact was very low in this game compared to the rest of the tourney.

Thoughts?

Last edited by biz; Mon Mar 26, 2012 at 10:54am. Reason: punctuation
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
New Syracuse Fan Adam Basketball 8 Thu Apr 01, 2010 02:41pm
Uconn vs Syracuse ref83 Basketball 44 Mon Mar 16, 2009 08:20pm
Syracuse again 26 Year Gap Basketball 7 Mon Mar 13, 2006 07:09pm
NUS Syracuse,NY mo99 Softball 0 Mon Mar 14, 2005 05:48pm
Anyone from Ohio/from near Ohio/with a Satelite Dish? Mark Dexter Basketball 6 Thu Jan 29, 2004 11:02am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:18am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1