The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Thu Mar 12, 2009, 11:21pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 10
Uconn vs Syracuse

End of regulation, 1.4 seconds remain. Syracuse inbounding on uconn endline.
Thabett covering throw-in, he runs over Syracuse screen. No call!! Can you believe it? A short time before this Thabett lowers shoulder and knocks over Syracuse defender. No call! What about the time-out Thabett called? He got posession on his belly, rolls over on his back and calls time-out.. Is this not a travel? What about the Syracuse break away and Syracuse player trailing knocks Uconn defender off his feet. Again no call!!!!! Any coments???
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Thu Mar 12, 2009, 11:23pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 14,616
Didn't think the contact on the foul was a throw-in.

Didn't see the timeout rollover play.

Thought there should have been a foul on the moving screen on the breakaway.

Shooting FTs?
__________________
"...as cool as the other side of the pillow." - Stuart Scott

"You should never be proud of doing the right thing." - Dean Smith
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Thu Mar 12, 2009, 11:34pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 261
Quote:
Originally Posted by BktBallRef View Post
Thought there should have been a foul on the moving screen on the breakaway.
Just curious as to why? Did you think the contact was from behind?
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Thu Mar 12, 2009, 11:39pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 10
No, I think it was a good no call. But Thabett mowed over and through the Syracuse screener at the end of regulation..
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Thu Mar 12, 2009, 11:42pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 261
Quote:
Originally Posted by ref83 View Post
No, I think it was a good no call. But Thabett mowed over and through the Syracuse screener at the end of regulation..
Two big time DQ-ing fouls in the 4th OT, but both easy/good calls I thought. One PC and another during rebounding action, but like I said, both pretty obvious.

Either way, this is one heck of a game, though Jamie Luckie must be a terrible official like everyone says. What kind of official would let a game go 4 OTs?!?!?!
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Thu Mar 12, 2009, 11:46pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Mizzouah!
Posts: 352
Wink

All I know is so far, we have 4 OT's. I guess Padgett isn't working this one
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Fri Mar 13, 2009, 03:19am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 15,015
Quote:
Originally Posted by NewNCref View Post
Two big time DQ-ing fouls in the 4th OT, but both easy/good calls I thought. One PC and another during rebounding action, but like I said, both pretty obvious.

Either way, this is one heck of a game, though Jamie Luckie must be a terrible official like everyone says. What kind of official would let a game go 4 OTs?!?!?!
I don't believe that he was one of the officials.

Officials: John Cahill ,James Breeding ,Bob Donato

Last edited by Nevadaref; Fri Mar 13, 2009 at 03:34am.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Thu Mar 12, 2009, 11:31pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 261
Today is Friday the 13th, and Sunday is the Ides of March, is this like a fanboy full moon? Does it cause normal people to turn into fanboys?

As for my comments:
Quote:
Originally Posted by ref83 View Post
Thabett covering throw-in, he runs over Syracuse screen. No call!! Can you believe it?
Didn't see it, but just because the defender is knocked down while setting a screen DOES NOT make it a foul. If he played through the defender, then maybe. But just because the screener fell (possibly hard) does not make it a foul

Quote:
Originally Posted by ref83 View Post
A short time before this Thabett lowers shoulder and knocks over Syracuse defender. No call!
Lowering of the shoulder is nowhere illegal. Check the book.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ref83 View Post
What about the time-out Thabett called? He got posession on his belly, rolls over on his back and calls time-out.. Is this not a travel?
The time-out, I think was not called by Thabeet,but rather by his teammates, and therefore he was granted the timeout before he rolled over. Maybe not, but it's what it looked like to me.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ref83 View Post
What about the Syracuse break away and Syracuse player trailing knocks Uconn defender off his feet. Again no call!!!!!
No way this was a foul. The contact was not from behind, it was from the side while both were executing legal moving screens.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Fri Mar 13, 2009, 08:20am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 14,616
Quote:
Originally Posted by NewNCref View Post
No way this was a foul. The contact was not from behind, it was from the side while both were executing legal moving screens.
That is not what happened.

The UConn defender was chasing, he was not setting a screen.

The Syracuse teammate was running beside the defender and turned left into him. I would compare it to walking beside a swimming pool with a friend and deciding to knock him in.

Quote:
Originally Posted by NewNCref View Post
Either way, this is one heck of a game, though Jamie Luckie must be a terrible official like everyone says. What kind of official would let a game go 4 OTs?!?!?!
Jamie Luckie was not working the game. He's working the ACC Tournament.
__________________
"...as cool as the other side of the pillow." - Stuart Scott

"You should never be proud of doing the right thing." - Dean Smith

Last edited by BktBallRef; Fri Mar 13, 2009 at 08:32am.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Fri Mar 13, 2009, 01:24pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 1,109
Highlights...

YouTube - SYRACUSE VS CONNECTICUT UNBELIEVEABLE GAME!!!!!!! 6 OVERTIMES! [March 12, 2009]
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Fri Mar 13, 2009, 01:27pm
Adam's Avatar
Keeper of the HAMMER
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: MST
Posts: 27,190
All I watched on ESPN this morning were highlights of that game.
__________________
Sprinkles are for winners.
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Mon Mar 16, 2009, 04:02pm
T42 T42 is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1
Uconn vs Syracuse

In 35 years officiating, when there was a question about a shot at the end of a game or overtime, we were always instructed to ask the timer "Where was the ball when the horn went off?" not "where was the ball when the clock went to 0:00?" I'm sure many official has had the clock go to 0:00 and the horn not sound. Wonder why this subject didn't come up at the end of regulation?
Any comment will be appreciated.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old Mon Mar 16, 2009, 04:25pm
Rich's Avatar
Get away from me, Steve.
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 15,790
Quote:
Originally Posted by T42 View Post
In 35 years officiating, when there was a question about a shot at the end of a game or overtime, we were always instructed to ask the timer "Where was the ball when the horn went off?" not "where was the ball when the clock went to 0:00?" I'm sure many official has had the clock go to 0:00 and the horn not sound. Wonder why this subject didn't come up at the end of regulation?
Any comment will be appreciated.
Because they have monitors and the on-court officials aren't going to leave this in the hands of a timer. Nor would I. Ever. At any level.
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old Mon Mar 16, 2009, 04:34pm
Do not give a damn!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: On the border
Posts: 30,540
Quote:
Originally Posted by T42 View Post
In 35 years officiating, when there was a question about a shot at the end of a game or overtime, we were always instructed to ask the timer "Where was the ball when the horn went off?" not "where was the ball when the clock went to 0:00?" I'm sure many official has had the clock go to 0:00 and the horn not sound. Wonder why this subject didn't come up at the end of regulation?
Any comment will be appreciated.
Those days are over, especially at the college level.

Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble."
-----------------------------------------------------------
Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010)
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old Mon Mar 16, 2009, 06:58pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 15,015
Quote:
Originally Posted by T42 View Post
In 35 years officiating, when there was a question about a shot at the end of a game or overtime, we were always instructed to ask the timer "Where was the ball when the horn went off?" not "where was the ball when the clock went to 0:00?" I'm sure many official has had the clock go to 0:00 and the horn not sound. Wonder why this subject didn't come up at the end of regulation?
Any comment will be appreciated.
I appreciate all of your years of experience, but I'm guessing that most of those were at the HS level and any collegiate experience that you have was prior to the use of the video monitor. Basically, your question can be answered by taking a quick look at the latest NCAA ruling. It was handed down following a game a couple of years ago in which the clock and the LED lights were not synchronized.

Currently at the NCAA level the zeros ON THE GAME CLOCK has the highest priority. The LED lights are 2nd, and the horn sounding is 3rd.

Rule 2, Section 13, Article 4.
In games with a 10th-of-a-second game clock display and where an
official courtside monitor is used, the reading of zeros on the game clock
is to be used to determine
whether a try for goal, a shot-clock violation or
a foul occurred before or after the expiration of time in any period. When
the game clock is not visible, the officials shall verify the original call with
the use of the red/LED light(s).
When the red/LED light(s) are not visible,
the sounding of the game-clock horn shall be utilized.
When definitive
information is unattainable with the use of the monitor, the original call
stands.

This is not the case with the shot clock. For the shot clock the horn is controlling and the showing of zero does NOT indicate a violation.

Rule 2, Section 11, Article 9.
Sound the shot-clock horn at the expiration of the shot-clock period.
This shot-clock horn shall not stop play unless recognized by an official’s
whistle. When the shot clock indicates zeros but the shot-clock horn has not sounded, the shot-clock time has not expired.
--------------------------------------
At the HS level under NFHS rules the SOUNDING OF THE HORN has the highest priority, even if there are supplementary lights per 2-12-7, 5-6-2, and 1-14.

2-12-7: "...Indicate by signal the expiration of playing time in each quarter or
extra period. If a supplementary red light is used, the timer’s signal is the official
expiration of playing time
."
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Connecticut/Syracuse wfd21 Basketball 6 Thu Feb 07, 2008 10:01pm
Clemson/Syracuse halftime T Nevadaref Basketball 3 Wed Mar 21, 2007 07:56pm
Syracuse again 26 Year Gap Basketball 7 Mon Mar 13, 2006 07:09pm
NUS Syracuse,NY mo99 Softball 0 Mon Mar 14, 2005 05:48pm
Charge on Syracuse steal & dunk Dan_ref Basketball 63 Thu Apr 10, 2003 10:17pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:56pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1