Consequences for ejected players by state

[Camron Rust]

Originally Posted by JRutledge

I have heard people say this before but I cannot find the reference that suggests a second T is a Flagrant? What about an indirect that passes the threshold and ejects a coach (e.g. Three bench Ts)?

Peace

Looks like that wording is no longer there. I'm pretty sure that, at one time, the 2nd T was considered a flagrant and that is how the disqualification for 2 T was triggered. Unlike a few here, I don't keep all my old books (When I get new ones, I donate them to others that can use them).

As far as the game administration is concerned, it is semantics. It doesn't change any part of the in-game penalty administration. I suppose, if my memory is correct, that it was changed to more equitably facilitate the various post game suspensions imposed by states....so that they can technically distinguish between flagrant acts and non-flagrant acts.