Quote:
Originally Posted by BillyMac
Does the NFHS still use the term "ejection" for players now that players are no longer banished to the showers. Doesn't the NFHS simply use the term "disqualified"?
|
You are right, the NF does not use the term "ejection" they do have a definition for "Disqualified Player."
I know that on our
Special Report the IHSA do uses the term "ejection" for the reason we file one.
But with that said, the NF Rulebook Definition does not say that a second technical foul is a flagrant foul. It says that a player is disqualified by either 5 personal fouls, two technical fouls or a flagrant foul. That is why I asked because it does not seem that they consider the second foul flagrant. I know it is not a big deal, but I think people get confused when you claim a second technical is flagrant when it just simply disqualified the player.
Peace