Consequences for ejected players by state

[JRutledge]

Originally Posted by BillyMac

Does the NFHS still use the term "ejection" for players now that players are no longer banished to the showers. Doesn't the NFHS simply use the term "disqualified"?

You are right, the NF does not use the term "ejection" they do have a definition for "Disqualified Player."

I know that on our Special Report the IHSA do uses the term "ejection" for the reason we file one.

But with that said, the NF Rulebook Definition does not say that a second technical foul is a flagrant foul. It says that a player is disqualified by either 5 personal fouls, two technical fouls or a flagrant foul. That is why I asked because it does not seem that they consider the second foul flagrant. I know it is not a big deal, but I think people get confused when you claim a second technical is flagrant when it just simply disqualified the player.

Peace

[BillyMac]

Originally Posted by BillyMac

Does the NFHS still use the term "ejection" for players now that players are no longer banished to the showers. Doesn't the NFHS simply use the term "disqualified"?

Originally Posted by JRutledge

You are right.

Oh my God. I don't know how to deal with this. This never happens to me. What am I supposed to do? Am I supposed to thank anybody? I didn't prepare a speech. Does my first correct post make me an esteemed member? I can't wait to call my Mom. Is a cash prize involved? Do I thank the little people who made this possible?

[Raymond]

Originally Posted by BillyMac

Oh my God. I don't know how to deal with this. This never happens to me. What am I supposed to do? Am I supposed to thank anybody? I didn't prepare a speech. Does my first correct post make me an esteemed member? I can't wait to call my Mom. Is a cash prize involved? Do I thank the little people who made this possible?

You could always ask Mark to dig in the attic and find out the last time you were right?

[SNIPERBBB]

Ohio:
Players and coaches 2 game suspension and done for the rest of the day of the contest.

Coach gets a $100 fine and has to take an online test.

[Bad Zebra]

Florida:

All "disqualifications" resulting from unsportsmanlike conduct (coach or player) are reported to the FHSAA in writing within 24 hours of game. State office then determines penalty depending on past history or behavior in question. I have seen as little as 1 game for a player and/or up to 6 games plus fines (usually in $250 increments) for a repeat offender coach. I don't think there is a set formula. Coach suspension will almost always include a fine to the school of $250 minimum. In case anyone's interested in the form:

https://www.fhsaa.org/webform/at6

[Camron Rust]

Originally Posted by JRutledge

You are right, the NF does not use the term "ejection" they do have a definition for "Disqualified Player."

Peace

Actually, they do in a few places.

From the NFHS's rules differences chart:

Disqualification/Ejection
Players/Bench Personnel

NFHS:
Disqualification – Fifth personal
Ejection – Single flagrant; second technical


The term is also used in a few other places as well, usually when talking about bench personnel (which includes team members).

Ejection, however, doesn't imply removal from the gym in the case of team members or players, only when the ejected party is an adult.

[BillyMac]

Originally Posted by BillyMac

Does the NFHS still use the term "ejection" for players now that players are no longer banished to the showers. Doesn't the NFHS simply use the term "disqualified"?

Originally Posted by JRutledge

You are right,

Originally Posted by BillyMac

This never happens to me. Does my first correct post make me an esteemed member?

Originally Posted by Camron Rust

Actually,they do in a few places. Disqualification – Fifth personal. Ejection – Single flagrant; second technical.
The term is also used in a few other places as well, usually when talking about bench personnel (which includes team members). Ejection, however, doesn't imply removal from the gym in the case of team members or players, only when the ejected party is an adult.

Great? So I was wrong. Do I have to give back my esteemed member status? How long will it be until JRutledge again posts that I'm right? You all know that I'm old, and don't have too much time left on this side of the grass. I may never be right again. I already called my Mom. Would it be alright if I just left her believing that I posted a correct answer on the Forum? She's eighty-five. It would break her heart to find out that my correct answer was actually wrong. And my post was about players, not adults. Please be sympathetic.

[JRutledge]

Originally Posted by BillyMac

Great? So I was wrong. Do I have to give back my esteemed member status? How long will it be until JRutledge again posts that I'm right? You all know that I'm old, and don't have too much time left on this side of the grass. I may never be right again. I already called my Mom. Would it be alright if I just left her believing that I posted a correct answer on the Forum? She's eighty-five. It would break her heart to find out that my correct answer was actually wrong. And my post was about players, not adults. Please be sympathetic.

You keep making posts like this and it will take a lot longer.

Peace