The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jan 26, 2012, 01:07pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 1,847
Quote:
Originally Posted by tref View Post
If my partners had no look or no whistle on the play, I dont need them to confirm that the player is bleeding.
Not sure where you're going with this, but the conference would not be to confirm the player is bleeding. It would be to confer on what happened and whether they saw it or had any input. I may not confer at all and on my way to the table decide it was an intentional. Regardless, I think it would be fine based on the OP to upgrade the call after the initial call.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jan 26, 2012, 01:16pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 2,183
Quote:
Originally Posted by Smitty View Post
Not sure where you're going with this, but the conference would not be to confirm the player is bleeding. It would be to confer on what happened and whether they saw it or had any input. I may not confer at all and on my way to the table decide it was an intentional. Regardless, I think it would be fine based on the OP to upgrade the call after the initial call.
Ummm again...

Quote:
Originally Posted by tref View Post
If my partners had no look or no whistle on the play, I dont need them to confirm that the player is bleeding.
I agree with the rest of what you say! I'm simply saying that blood in & of itself isnt a deciding factor on whether to upgrade or not. Thats all.
__________________
I gotta new attitude!

Last edited by tref; Thu Jan 26, 2012 at 02:04pm.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jan 26, 2012, 01:27pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 1,847
Quote:
Originally Posted by tref View Post
I agree with the rest of what you say! I'm simply saying that blood in of itself isnt a deciding factor on whether to upgrade or not. thats all.
That's cool. I just wanted to be clear that I wasn't conferring to see if the player was bleeding, which is what you implied. My original response to your scenario was to declare it an orange in the discussion about apples. Blood had no bearing on my comments.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jan 26, 2012, 01:29pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 2,183
Yezzir!
__________________
I gotta new attitude!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jan 27, 2012, 08:37am
Courageous When Prudent
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Hampton Roads, VA
Posts: 14,950
Quote:
Originally Posted by tref View Post
If my partners had no look or no whistle on the play, I dont need them to confirm that the player is bleeding.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Smitty View Post
Not sure where you're going with this, but the conference would not be to confirm the player is bleeding. ...
I think he responding to this portion of the OP:

Quote:
Originally Posted by mbyron View Post
...Thoughts? If you had been my partner and had seen the bloody nose (even if you hadn't seen the foul) would you have asked me about upgrading?
I'm not not coming to my partner to discuss upgrading just because I see blood. I would only come if I too had seen the act in question.
__________________
A-hole formerly known as BNR
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:56am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1