![]() |
|
|||
Maybe get Game Management to help you out on this one...
that is if the coach won't leave...have him removed.
__________________
Dan Ivey Tri-City Sports Officials Asso. (TCSOA) Member since 1989 Richland, WA |
|
|||
Quote:
Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble." ----------------------------------------------------------- Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010) |
|
|||
Quote:
If we were limited I think it would be written that we are limited. |
|
|||
Quote:
Although now that I'm re reading it, the article could mean Valentine's 2nd technical, which may have been the 3rd technical. Or it could mean the 2nd technical overall and not the 3rd as I interpreted. Someone should have proofread that article ![]() Last edited by Toren; Tue Jan 10, 2012 at 01:39pm. |
|
|||
Quote:
"That didn’t set well with the 40-year-old Valentine, a man who started officiating basketball in 1978 and who by 1979 worked his first Division I game." (emphasis added) |
|
|||
Quote:
I think if we could hit the ejected coach, by rule, it would say somewhere that we assess any additional technicals to the bench or assistant coach.
__________________
I gotta new attitude! |
|
|||
Quote:
So the only thing it might add is if it was the assistant coach's 3rd indirect, he would also be ejected, but that doesn't seem to be the intent of the rule. The assistant didn't do much to earn that indirect technical and then we would probably have further escalation as we tell the assistant he's also ejected. So it's just charged to the head. I'm not positive either way, I just don't see any limit. |
|
|||
We don't whack the coach though, we whack the player even if he is DQed and if the coach has been notified of the DQ, it is also an indirect to the coach.
__________________
Even if you’re on the right track, you’ll get run over if you just sit there. - Will Rogers |
|
|||
In NCAA, a coach can get a maximum of 2 Class A technical fouls. So if you eject him with a second T, you can't T him again. This rule change was a result of the Knight/Valentine incident that was already mentioned in the thread.
|
|
|||
Someone here recently made the case that an ejected coach becomes a team supporter, and utilizing 2-8-1, a team technical foul could be issued for any team supporter that interrupts the game.
|
|
|||
True story!
__________________
I gotta new attitude! |
|
|||
That's a weak argument since the coach is not even supposed to be in the gym, let alone support the team any longer.
|
|
|||
Quote:
Quote:
|
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Technical Foul or Ejection...what would you do? | GoodwillRef | Basketball | 53 | Thu Jan 20, 2011 11:58am |
Player Technical Or Team Technical ??? | BillyMac | Basketball | 2 | Sat Dec 12, 2009 06:32pm |
Bench Technical vs. Player Technical | whistlesblow | Basketball | 25 | Tue Jan 20, 2009 08:09am |
Technical - Ejection | billyc8037 | Basketball | 21 | Fri Jan 25, 2008 04:49pm |
Delay - Team Technical or Player Technical? | BillyMac | Basketball | 11 | Mon Nov 26, 2007 06:30pm |