After the shot Foul

[Welpe]

Originally Posted by tref

How about we signal the attempt when the try is attempted & simply do our jobs by refereeing the shooter up, down & beyond. After all we dont need to follow the flight of the ball to determine if a shot scored.

Welpe likes this.

[Freddy]

Originally Posted by tref

. . . integrity issues . . . accusations.

Originally Posted by tref

How about we signal the attempt when the try is attempted & simply do our jobs by refereeing the shooter up, down & beyond.

Since it works for you, I'm for that.

[tref]

Originally Posted by tref
. . . integrity issues . . . accusations.

Originally Posted by Freddy

Black team (team A) at home playing a white team (team B) all 3 officials are black.
A1s 3 point shot goes up in the opposite table corner, shooter is extremely close to the line. B1 does his job of attempting to put doubt in our minds by saying "he's on the line" & his coach heres it. The shooter lands & now your signal goes up all of a sudden.
That doesnt look good live or on tape & opens up the door for many interpretations of the officials integrity.

Also, what about shooters that really elevate? If that shot goes in before they land (and you signal the attempt) how can you go straight to the successful signal without the attempt signal?

[mbyron]

Originally Posted by Welpe

Welpe likes this.

Sez who?

[Adam]

Originally Posted by mbyron

Sez who?

It was a bit presumptuous.

[Welpe]

Originally Posted by mbyron

Sez who?

Umm...+1?

[Raymond]

Originally Posted by The_Rookie

Hello,

Recent game, A4 shoots a 3 and B2 crashes into A4 after the ball is released.

Need some help on distinction when the foul is on the shot versus after the shot.

FYI, saw similar play in a VB tourney game that required the 2 officials to huddle briefly.

Thanks and Happy New Year!

Could really use a better description of the play. Very vague. A more thorough description would probably allowed for you to answer the question yourself.