Conclusion?
 

Did you guys get it right?

Does anyone see a possibility of goaltending?

Goaltending involves a try or tap ... at a team's own basket.

In college maybe. But hitting the backboard does not mean much of anything in NF Rules. And even in college the ball must be completely above the rim to be a consideration of being a goal tending violation.

Peace

Yep, but the question (whether the ball had gone through before or after the horn in the OP) had been answered already, so it didn't matter. I wouldn't want someone thinking there's a reason not to count the score here just because the try may have been over.

It seems everybody over thinks sitches, forget buzzer part of question as tap happened before buzzer. I wouldn't think of goaltending as the requirements for goaltending were not mentioned in OP, or you're just adding food for thought?

OK Snaqs, whatever you say.

Peace

If you look at Case 6.7.6 Situation B, I guess it doesn't matter as long as the tap was before the horn.

It does matter, if the tap was by B. In that case, the ball has to be in the basket before the horn to count.

I'd give good odds that APG misread the OP when he said it wouldn't count.

If the tap occurred before the try had ended, I think we'd either have GT or BI. Can't imagine how someone could tap a try into the basket otherwise. We're not talking about a "tip" as occurs when a player attempts to block a shot.

When I read the OP, I pictured a shot or layout and the hits the backboard, and then is coming down towards the basket. Then B hits the ball and it goes into the basket - either before or after the horn sounds.

Well that is the way I read it. I do not think the term "tap" was used in the true sense of the definition. It sounded to me like an explanation of how the ball got into the basket.

Peace

Uhmmm...did you read the original post? Status of the horn was clearly stated.

What is your basis in thinking the basket might not count?

Some of us knew.