|
|
|
Wed Oct 26, 2011, 03:01pm
|
|||
|
|||
|
Don't think the new rule changed 4-4-1:
A ball which is in contact with a player or with the court is in the backcourt if either the ball or the player (either player if the ball is touching more than one) is touching the backcourt. More directly, and though you address it, the status of the ball doesn't change to frontcourt for purposes of the rule according to 4-4-6: During a dribble from backcourt to frontcourt, the ball is in the frontcourt when the ball and both feet of the dribbler touch the court entirely in the frontcourt. Since the ball is never established in the frontcourt according to the above I don't think it contradicts the new wording. 
|
|
Wed Oct 26, 2011, 03:04pm
|
|||
|
|||
|
No contradiction...you never caused the ball to go into the frontcourt by virtue of you being a dribbler which means the ball is in the frontcourt only when both feet and the ball are in the frontcourt.
__________________
Chaos isn't a pit. Chaos is a ladder. Many who try to climb it fail and never get to try again. The fall breaks them. And some, given a chance to climb, they refuse. They cling to the realm, or the gods, or love. Illusions. Only the ladder is real. The climb is all there is.
|
 |
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Backcourt rule | Jay R | Basketball | 1 | Thu Dec 11, 2008 09:32pm |
| NCAA backcourt rule different? | TriggerMN | Basketball | 3 | Fri Mar 10, 2006 09:46am |
| Book Problem - NF Rule 3.2.2 | Larks | Basketball | 3 | Mon Jan 23, 2006 01:03am |
| Rule book help with backcourt... | devdog69 | Basketball | 2 | Tue Feb 03, 2004 01:19pm |
| backcourt---the most confusing rule in b-ball | Todd (Mike) Mullen | Basketball | 15 | Mon Dec 27, 1999 02:58am |
Hybrid Mode
