Backcourt?

[bob jenkins]

Originally Posted by BadNewsRef

Which "new rule" are we talking about?

I know the OP is not a BC violaton but I'm wondering as to what new rule you are referring.

The new "TC on a throw-in" rule -- it's led to some changes in wording in other areas (including cases)

[Raymond]

Originally Posted by bob jenkins

The new "TC on a throw-in" rule -- it's led to some changes in wording in other areas (including cases)

That's what I searching for, where does it say that there has to be "both team AND PLAYER control in the frontcourt" in order for a backcourt violation to occur?

[stiffler3492]

NEW NFHS backcourt violation rule

Here's the thread on this from a couple months ago.

[Raymond]

Nevada's post is misleading as the new TC rule and its associated case plays make no reference to " both team AND PLAYER control in the frontcourt". The newly worded rule he is referencing is 9-9-1.

I'm quite sure the "rule change" the OP wanted us to "keep in mind" was 4-12-2d.

[stiffler3492]

Well, what I was going for was how the new team control on throw in rule affected backcourt violations.

The general consensus seems to be that what I had was no violation, because there was never player control in the frontcourt.

[Raymond]

Originally Posted by stiffler3492

Well, what I was going for was how the new team control on throw in rule affected backcourt violations.

The general consensus seems to be that what I had was no violation, because there was never player control in the frontcourt.

No doubt about that. Just that Nevada is a lawyer and likes to play word games.

[stiffler3492]

Originally Posted by BadNewsRef

No doubt about that. Just that Nevada is a lawyer and likes to play word games.

I'm no english major either...I prefer words less than four syllables.

[Adam]

Originally Posted by stiffler3492

Well, what I was going for was how the new team control on throw in rule affected backcourt violations.

The general consensus seems to be that what I had was no violation, because there was never player control in the frontcourt.

PC in the FC is not required for a violation. The committee made it clear that the change is only intended to affect whether FTs are shot on fouls.

[just another ref]

Originally Posted by Snaqwells

PC in the FC is not required for a violation.

9-9-1: A player shall not be the first to touch the ball after it has been in player and team control in the frontcourt.....

[just another ref]

Originally Posted by stiffler3492

Well, what I was going for was how the new team control on throw in rule affected backcourt violations.

The new team control rule itself does not specifically affect the backcourt violation, because the throw-in does not originate in frontcourt or backcourt. It originates out of bounds.

[Adam]

Originally Posted by just another ref

The new team control rule itself does not specifically affect the backcourt violation, because the throw-in does not originate in frontcourt or backcourt. It originates out of bounds.

I forgot to do this sooner, but this is just wrong.