Backcourt?

[Nevadaref]

The wording of the new rule requires both team AND PLAYER control in the frontcourt. Since there was no player control established in the frontcourt, there cannot be a backcourt violation.

[stiffler3492]

Thanks. That's the way I called it, but I wanted to double check with the new rule

[Raymond]

Originally Posted by Nevadaref

The wording of the new rule requires both team AND PLAYER control in the frontcourt. Since there was no player control established in the frontcourt, there cannot be a backcourt violation.

Which "new rule" are we talking about?

I know the OP is not a BC violaton but I'm wondering as to what new rule you are referring.

[bob jenkins]

Originally Posted by BadNewsRef

Which "new rule" are we talking about?

I know the OP is not a BC violaton but I'm wondering as to what new rule you are referring.

The new "TC on a throw-in" rule -- it's led to some changes in wording in other areas (including cases)

[Raymond]

Originally Posted by bob jenkins

The new "TC on a throw-in" rule -- it's led to some changes in wording in other areas (including cases)

That's what I searching for, where does it say that there has to be "both team AND PLAYER control in the frontcourt" in order for a backcourt violation to occur?

[stiffler3492]

NEW NFHS backcourt violation rule

Here's the thread on this from a couple months ago.

[Raymond]

Nevada's post is misleading as the new TC rule and its associated case plays make no reference to " both team AND PLAYER control in the frontcourt". The newly worded rule he is referencing is 9-9-1.

I'm quite sure the "rule change" the OP wanted us to "keep in mind" was 4-12-2d.

[stiffler3492]

Well, what I was going for was how the new team control on throw in rule affected backcourt violations.

The general consensus seems to be that what I had was no violation, because there was never player control in the frontcourt.