2011 NCAAM Sweet 16

[Raymond]

Originally Posted by AllPurposeGamer

This play is being referenced in another thread.

YouTube - Possible Intentional Foul?

Run of the mill shooting foul or upgrade to an intentional?

Not as obvious an intentional foul as I was expecting based on all the chatter here. Have no problem if they had come together and gone with IF but seeing the play at normal speed the first time I thought the player initially made a play on the ball. Further scrutiny leads to going IF but I can understand how the officials didn't go with an IF at the moment.

[Camron Rust]

I have no idea who's idea it was to lump all discussions about the games into one thread but it is a horrible idea. It is nearly impossible to tell which comments go with which play at this point.

[tref]

Originally Posted by BadNewsRef

Not as obvious an intentional foul as I was expecting based on all the chatter here. Have no problem if they had come together and gone with IF but seeing the play at normal speed the first time I thought the player initially made a play on the ball. Further scrutiny leads to going IF but I can understand how the officials didn't go with an IF at the moment.

I respect that, but I have yet to see a legitimate play on the ball. What I do see clearly is an airborne player being grabbed as he's trying to bang one home.

In regards to your "at the moment" comment, I guess time & score does factor in at what we do...

[Raymond]

Originally Posted by tref

...
In regards to your "at the moment" comment, I guess time & score does factor in at what we do...

While they may be case in some plays that's not what I meant this time. I meant if my first look at the play I felt like the defender may a legit play on the ball I can see how at that moment the officials on the court thought the same.

I agree that after reviewing the play we have an IF.