Another suggested FED rule change

[Raymond]

Originally Posted by chseagle

Back to the topic at hand:

How about just using all NCAA Rules (or variations of)?

One problem with that is that there are 2 sets of NCAA rules, one for Women and one for Men. Which set are you suggesting the NFHS adopt?

[chseagle]

Originally Posted by BadNewsRef

One problem with that is that there are 2 sets of NCAA rules, one for Women and one for Men. Which set are you suggesting the NFHS adopt?

Well since no one wants to implement the new NCAA-M 3-pt. line, NCAA-W Rules.

[chseagle]

Originally Posted by chseagle

Back to the topic at hand:

How about just using all NCAA Rules (or variations of)?

Originally Posted by BadNewsRef

One problem with that is that there are 2 sets of NCAA rules, one for Women and one for Men. Which set are you suggesting the NFHS adopt?

Originally Posted by chseagle

Well since no one wants to implement the new NCAA-M 3-pt. line, NCAA-W Rules.

Can we please get back on topic, as evidenced above I did.

[Welpe]

Originally Posted by chseagle

Can we please get back on topic, as evidenced above I did.

You're kidding me. You drive us off into the Badlands with your non-sense and then want to turn around?

Tell you what, why don't you quit polluting all of our OFFICIATING threads with your scoreboard/timekeeper/shotclock/guardianofthegameandallthatisholy nonsense that nobody really gives two rat turds about? It's getting old and I'm tired of biting me tongue over it.

[Mark Padgett]

Gee - I think that's what this thread was about some time in a past life. How about this one:

If an official stops play due to an injured player, that player must leave and be substituted even if the coach is not beckoned, or that team must use a TO to keep the player in the game. IOW - just eliminate the "coach being beckoned" aspect of the current rule.

I know there would be some issues if this came to pass, but it could be fun to discuss it.

BTW - I really don't care how this would affect table personnel.

[APG]

Originally Posted by Mark Padgett

Gee - I think that's what this thread was about some time in a past life. How about this one:

If an official stops play due to an injured player, that player must leave and be substituted even if the coach is not beckoned, or that team must use a TO to keep the player in the game. IOW - just eliminate the "coach being beckoned" aspect of the current rule.

I know there would be some issues if this came to pass, but it could be fun to discuss it.

BTW - I really don't care how this would affect table personnel.

What's the issue with the rule as written...and what would this solve? I don't see this speeding up anything. If you stop play and the player is good to go without beckoning the coach, I feel that would be faster than stopping play, making sure the player is okay, then telling the coach we need a sub or god forgive, take an unnecessary timeout to buy them back in the game.

[chseagle]

Originally Posted by Mark Padgett

Gee - I think that's what this thread was about some time in a past life. How about this one:

If an official stops play due to an injured player, that player must leave and be substituted even if the coach is not beckoned, or that team must use a TO to keep the player in the game. IOW - just eliminate the "coach being beckoned" aspect of the current rule.

I know there would be some issues if this came to pass, but it could be fun to discuss it.

BTW - I really don't care how this would affect table personnel.

Isn't that what the 20 sec. DQ/Injury TO is for?

If an injured player is not ready to play in the 20 sec. timeframe, then they must sit a tick.

[APG]

Originally Posted by chseagle

Isn't that what the 20 sec. DQ/Injury TO is for?

If an injured player is not ready to play in the 20 sec. timeframe, then they must sit a tick.

If we deem a player has to come out of the game, the coach has 20 seconds to replace him. There is no hard, fast rule that gives a player 20 seconds to recover though if it took anywhere near that long, the coach is going to be beckoned.

[Adam]

Originally Posted by chseagle

Isn't that what the 20 sec. DQ/Injury TO is for?

If an injured player is not ready to play in the 20 sec. timeframe, then they must sit a tick.

1. No, it's not what the 20 second rule is for.
2. It's not a TO.
3. Once that 20 second clock starts, he already must sit a tick. If the 20 seconds passes w/o a sub, the coach earns himself a T, and he must sit the rest of the game.

[bob jenkins]

Originally Posted by Snaqwells

1. No, it's not what the 20 second rule is for.
2. It's not a TO.
3. Once that 20 second clock starts, he already must sit a tick. If the 20 seconds passes w/o a sub, the coach earns himself a T, and he must sit the rest of the game.

A good timer would have known that.

[Mark Padgett]

Originally Posted by bob jenkins

A good timer would have known that.

You mean like this guy?



Oh wait - I thought you said old timer. Sorry. On second thought, maybe this is a pic of our resident timer after all.

[26 Year Gap]

Originally Posted by bob jenkins

A good timer would have known that.

They are all on goodtimer dot com