Nova / Syracuse rescinded intentional

[TheOracle]

[QUOTE=Jurassic Referee;732939]Naw, that's not in dispute at all. If you look at the video that mbyron linked, you'll see the L signal an intentional foul.
QUOTE]

There is no debate. He made a preliminary signal on a double-whistle that was not his call. It was not an intentional foul. The L had no chance to see the play up top because of the backboard, which is exactly why it was not his call. The C explained that to him, told him there was no way it was an intentional foul, and the L smartly and correctly deferred to the C. The crew did the right thing, and nobody will be penalized for it at all. End of story.

[Adam]

Originally Posted by TheOracle

The crew did the right thing, and nobody will be penalized for it at all. End of story.

Well then, we may as well close the thread.

[26 Year Gap]

Originally Posted by Snaqwells

Well then, we may as well close the thread.

Am I going to have to give you a list of people not to quote?

[Adam]

Originally Posted by 26 Year Gap

Am I going to have to give you a list of people not to quote?

I wondered about that, so I went back and cut most of his post out. You'll have to read JR's post to get the real drivel.

[26 Year Gap]

Originally Posted by Snaqwells

I wondered about that, so I went back and cut most of his post out. You'll have to read JR's post to get the real drivel.

Thanks. You're a real pal. Send me a pm so I can return the favor some day.

[upprdeck]

of course the head of the BE officials also ruled today the correct call should have been excessive use of force 2 shots and the ball..

[Rich]

Originally Posted by upprdeck

of course the head of the BE officials also ruled today the correct call should have been excessive use of force 2 shots and the ball..

In other words, an intentional foul. QED.

[Adam]

Originally Posted by upprdeck

of course the head of the BE officials also ruled today the correct call should have been excessive use of force 2 shots and the ball..

Excessive use of force? Isn't that supposed to cost him his badge?

[Adam]

Originally Posted by 26 Year Gap

Thanks. You're a real pal. Send me a pm so I can return the favor some day.

Quit whining and enjoy your weather.

[Jurassic Referee]

Originally Posted by TheOracle

There is no debate. He made a preliminary signal on a double-whistle that was not his call. It was not an intentional foul. The L had no chance to see the play up top because of the backboard, which is exactly why it was not his call. The C explained that to him, told him there was no way it was an intentional foul, and the L smartly and correctly deferred to the C. The crew did the right thing, and nobody will be penalized for it at all. End of story.

It's not the L's call on a fast break shot? Gee, you learn something new every day.

You're really saying that the L couldn't see the contact because the backboard blocked his view of the contact? You're saying the contact was OVER 10 feet off the ground. Do you know how ridiculous that is? Did you even bother to watch the video? If so, take a look at the level the contact was actually made at.

And you know all of what was said...how? You really know exactly every single word the the C said to the L? And you know for absolutely sure then that the L smartly and correctly deferred to the C?

Or are you just oracling to hear yourself oracle again? If so, try not to get any of your oraclings on you. They're harder than hell to get out in the wash.

[TheOracle]

[QUOTE=Jurassic Referee;732963]It's not the L's call on a fast break shot? Gee, you learn something new every day.

I guess you really don't know much. On a fast break, the L takes his side, and the C takes the other. Glad I'm able to teach you something.

[jbduke]

[QUOTE=TheOracle;733022]

Originally Posted by Jurassic Referee

It's not the L's call on a fast break shot? Gee, you learn something new every day.

I guess you really don't know much. On a fast break, the L takes his side, and the C takes the other. Glad I'm able to teach you something.

You don't work much men's college, do you? If you do, you'd better study up quick before you're found out.

[Adam]

Originally Posted by jbduke

You don't work much men's college, do you? If you do, you'd better study up quick before you're found out.

Are you talking to JR or TheOracle?

[jbduke]

Originally Posted by Snaqwells

Are you talking to JR or TheOracle?

For once, I'm not engaging (intentionally or not) JR

[Adam]

Originally Posted by jbduke

For once, I'm not engaging (intentionally or not) JR

Then you might want to consider fixing that post.