Quote:
Originally posted by Nevadaref
Quote:
Originally posted by Jurassic Referee
Quote:
Originally posted by ChuckElias
It still is a double violation, isn't it? Since nobody was lined up on the lane, none of the violations falls under the new rule.
Chuck
|
What if the shooting team violates first in this sitch?
|
In another thread, I just wrote that JR should be listened to. I may have to take that back. Or possibly just make a caveat "unless he is just being silly!"
It is impossible for the shooting team to violate first under these conditions. The defense has violated as soon as the ball is placed at the disposal of the free thrower. See 9.1.2
|
Silly? How can 9.1.2 be relevant?That sitch only talks about a B violation! I'm talking about delayed violations on both teams,with A actually committing the first called violation.Take Cameron's original situation above,but let A violate before B,
Silly?
[Edited by Jurassic Referee on Nov 14th, 2002 at 07:13 PM]
Thu Nov 14, 2002, 08:07pm
Threaded Mode
