The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rating: Thread Rating: 12 votes, 4.58 average. Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Wed Feb 16, 2011, 03:05pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Oregon
Posts: 70
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nevadaref View Post
Well it does have to have a chance to go in.
explain please
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Wed Feb 16, 2011, 03:14pm
APG APG is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 5,889
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThatOneRef View Post
explain please
The simple fact that a player touches the ball after it hits the backboard does not make it goaltending.

NCAA

Rule 4
Section 34. Goaltending
Art. 1. Goaltending shall have occurred when a defensive player touches the ball during a field-goal try and each of the following conditions is met:
Exceptions: Rules 10-3.6; 10-6.1.i
a. The ball is in its downward flight; and
b. The entire ball is above the level of the ring and has the possibility, while in flight, of entering the basket and is not touching the cylinder.

Art. 3. When the entire ball is above the level of the ring during a field-goal try and contacts the backboard, it is considered to be on its downward flight. In such a case, it is goaltending when the ball is touched by a player.
__________________
Chaos isn't a pit. Chaos is a ladder. Many who try to climb it fail and never get to try again. The fall breaks them. And some, given a chance to climb, they refuse. They cling to the realm, or the gods, or love. Illusions.

Only the ladder is real. The climb is all there is.

Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Wed Feb 16, 2011, 04:14pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Oregon
Posts: 70
never said it was goaltending, it dosnt make sense to be goal tending because the ball was still in an upwards motion, i wanted to know why it WOULD be goaltending if the ball still "had a chance to go in" but was in a upwards motion.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Wed Feb 16, 2011, 04:17pm
APG APG is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 5,889
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThatOneRef View Post
never said it was goaltending, it dosnt make sense to be goal tending because the ball was still in an upwards motion, i wanted to know why it WOULD be goaltending if the ball still "had a chance to go in" but was in a upwards motion.
Because by rule, once it contacts the backboard, above rim level, and with a chance to score, it is considered on its downward flight.
__________________
Chaos isn't a pit. Chaos is a ladder. Many who try to climb it fail and never get to try again. The fall breaks them. And some, given a chance to climb, they refuse. They cling to the realm, or the gods, or love. Illusions.

Only the ladder is real. The climb is all there is.

Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Wed Feb 16, 2011, 04:24pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Oregon
Posts: 70
Quote:
Originally Posted by AllPurposeGamer View Post
Because by rule, once it contacts the backboard, above rim level, and with a chance to score, it is considered on its downward flight.
Cool, thanks for the explanation. One more question tho.. lol
So it would be mostly a judgment call on whether or not it would go in?
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Wed Feb 16, 2011, 04:27pm
APG APG is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 5,889
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThatOneRef View Post
Cool, thanks for the explanation. One more question tho.. lol
So it would be mostly a judgment call on whether or not it would go in?
Yes it would be a judgement call, but it's pretty obvious when the ball doesn't have a chance to score. Also note, that this rule is for NCAA and not for NFHS. Under NFHS rules, we still have to judge whether the ball is on it's downward flight off the backboard.
__________________
Chaos isn't a pit. Chaos is a ladder. Many who try to climb it fail and never get to try again. The fall breaks them. And some, given a chance to climb, they refuse. They cling to the realm, or the gods, or love. Illusions.

Only the ladder is real. The climb is all there is.

Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Wed Feb 16, 2011, 04:28pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Oregon
Posts: 70
Quote:
Originally Posted by AllPurposeGamer View Post
Yes it would be a judgement call, but it's pretty obvious when the ball doesn't have a chance to score. Also note, that this rule is for NCAA and not for NFHS. Under NFHS rules, we still have to judge whether the ball is on it's downward flight off the backboard.
sweet, THANKS!
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Wed Feb 16, 2011, 04:32pm
Courageous When Prudent
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Hampton Roads, VA
Posts: 14,964
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThatOneRef View Post
Cool, thanks for the explanation. One more question tho.. lol
So it would be mostly a judgment call on whether or not it would go in?
That's what us old guys get paid to do, make judgement calls.
__________________
A-hole formerly known as BNR
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Ball off the top of the backboard OklahomaRef Basketball 6 Thu Feb 15, 2007 10:01am
Ever have a bad day affect your officiating? Huntin' Ref Basketball 12 Mon Jan 15, 2007 03:40pm
Ball over the backboard easygoer Basketball 5 Sun Apr 17, 2005 08:30am
Does tip affect this? Rock'nRef Basketball 2 Thu Oct 16, 2003 02:01pm
Ball in the backboard bassfreak76 Basketball 11 Mon Aug 11, 2003 01:28am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:18am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1