travel to end uconn villanova

[letemplay]

Still, in real time, looks close enough to a jump stop to be legal.

[Adam]

Originally Posted by letemplay

Still, in real time, looks close enough to a jump stop to be legal.

I don't know, the first time I saw the video I could tell it was a travel, in real time. Close enough to go either way? Probably, but it's still an obvious travel to me.

[letemplay]

you saw the video, not the first time the ref, or a ref, saw the PLAY.

[Adam]

Originally Posted by letemplay

you saw the video, not the first time the ref, or a ref, saw the PLAY.

According to this logic, video replay is useless.

[letemplay]

It would be in this situation. The call has to stand.

[APG]

Originally Posted by letemplay

It would be in this situation. The call has to stand.

I don't understand this statement? The video clearly shows the play was a travel. It also shows there was a foul on the play.

[Adam]

Originally Posted by letemplay

It would be in this situation. The call has to stand.

???

Thanks, Captain Obvious.

Obviously the call stands, it's not a reviewable play. It does, however, show the official missed the call. Now, he may have decided to let the travel go after letting the foul go, or he may have simply missed it. But the fact is, he missed it.

[letemplay]

What are you or anyone else gonna do with it now? Use it as a future training video? I'm only backing, not bashing, the official(s) on this. I'm betting any one of you would NOT have called a walk when seeing it FIRST and in REAL time. We could all pull tapes where we missed a call or two and besides the jump stops now a days have gotten out of hand imo. I agreed it was a walk when seeing it slow; I guess I just don't know what the point of questioning it now is. Most of you guys have been the first to come to the defense of fellow officials, rather than the other way around.

Signed,

Captain Obvious