Is there a case for this sit?

[stosh]

Originally Posted by Corndog89

Did B1 push A2 intentionally to disrupt the shot? If so, call it an intentional foul.

I used to do this a lot in rec leagues many years ago, and I was never called for a foul a single time. Of course, it could be rec league refs...who knows?

I thought about that, but really B1 was just pushing through a screen to try and defend A1's shot and was too forceful in pushing A2 into A1. A2 falling into A1 actually made it impossible for B1 to make any contact on A1 or we may have had a multiple foul situation.

[Adam]

Originally Posted by stosh

I thought about that, but really B1 was just pushing through a screen to try and defend A1's shot and was too forceful in pushing A2 into A1. A2 falling into A1 actually made it impossible for B1 to make any contact on A1 or we may have had a multiple foul situation.

Would have been a false multiple foul, actually. And I wouldn't hesitate to call it if a defender forced his way (illegally) through a screen and proceded to foul the shooter (assuming the try had begun prior to the first foul.)