?? back court violation

[bbcowboy]

Team A is on offense and shoots the ball. Team A player tips the ball backwards and it goes into the backcourt. Another Team A player picks up the ball again and advances the ball.
Is this a backcourt violation?
Thanks.

[bob jenkins]

Originally Posted by bbcowboy

Team A is on offense and shoots the ball. Team A player tips the ball backwards and it goes into the backcourt. Another Team A player picks up the ball again and advances the ball.
Is this a backcourt violation?
Thanks.

TC is lost on the shot, was it ever gained again?

[SNIPERBBB]

Unless the officials judge that the tip was controlled, then it would not be a violation as there was no team control.

[BillyMac]

During a throwin, even under a team’s own basket, if the throwin is deflected, tipped, or batted by an offensive player in the frontcourt to an offensive player in the backcourt; or after a missed field goal attempt or a missed foul shot attempt, if the ball is deflected, tipped, or batted by an offensive player in the frontcourt to an offensive player in the backcourt; these are not a backcourt violations. In both cases team control, a player holding or dribbling the ball, has not yet been established.

[Adam]

Originally Posted by SNIPERBBB

Unless the officials judge that the tip was controlled, then it would not be a violation as there was no team control.

Is a "controlled" tip included in the events than begin team control?

[Jurassic Referee]

Originally Posted by SNIPERBBB

Unless the officials judge that the tip was controlled, then it would not be a violation as there was no team control.

Your verbiage is too confusing imo. You can control a tip without establishing player and thus team control. You can control a tip from one end of the court to the other aamof without establishing player control.

[SNIPERBBB]

Controlled in this case would mean that it was the start of a dribble. This came up a couple years ago in either the case book or one of the pre-season NFHS fliers that comes with the books, might of been the OHSAA flier. Caused a big debate in our association and general consensus was that if you determine a tip or a player batting the ball back in bounds, your asking for whatever comes next.

[Adam]

Originally Posted by SNIPERBBB

Controlled in this case would mean that it was the start of a dribble. This came up a couple years ago in either the case book or one of the pre-season NFHS fliers that comes with the books, might of been the OHSAA flier. Caused a big debate in our association and general consensus was that if you determine a tip or a player batting the ball back in bounds, your asking for whatever comes next.

Are you saying that if you consider these to be "control," then you're asking for trouble? Or that if you consider these not to be control, you're asking for trouble? It's not clear.

[Jurassic Referee]

Originally Posted by SNIPERBBB

Controlled in this case would mean that it was the start of a dribble. This came up a couple years ago in either the case book or one of the pre-season NFHS fliers that comes with the books, might of been the OHSAA flier. Caused a big debate in our association and general consensus was that if you determine a tip or a player batting the ball back in bounds, your asking for whatever comes next.

I'm with Snaqs...confused.

By rule there's no player control on either a batt or a tipp.

Are you thinking of case book play 7.1.1SitD? In that one, the player caught the ball; he didn't batt or tip it back in-bounds.

And btw, while you're in the case book, 4.12.6(b) is the reference for answering bbcowboy's original question. Touched, tipped, batted...same, same....none establish player control.

[justacoach]

Originally Posted by bbcowboy

Team A is on offense and shoots the ball. Team A player tips the ball backwards and it goes into the backcourt. Another Team A player picks up the ball again and advances the ball.
Is this a backcourt violation?
Thanks.

#1 son had this call deemed a BC violation by 3 of the 4 officials who witnessed the play. Guess whose integrity and reputation are still intact after the assn interpreter gave correct ruling? No Call
Not a lot of room for discussion once you note the patently obvious failure to regain TC til ball reaches BC.