20-Second I.O.T. for Blood?

[bainsey]

Originally Posted by Jurassic Referee

For a relatively new official(5 years or so, right?) who hasn't really broken into high school varsity ball yet, you sureashell try to come across as all-knowing when you get into discussions like this. .... usual you blithely motor on insisting that your personal flights of fancy HAVE to be correct.

Interesting perspective. I don't believe it to be my flights, though.

I asked a question here, to gather thoughts on something that didn't seem right to me. Later, I found the answer, a citation, and a source. And in the end, my RefSchool contact said the answer in the software was indeed erroneous. Problem solved.

Snaq, I think you're right about "reading too much into it." It's one simple question, folks, and on a test, a rookie gets the same amount of points as a veteran.

[Back In The Saddle]

Originally Posted by bainsey

Interesting perspective. I don't believe it to be my flights, though.

I asked a question here, to gather thoughts on something that didn't seem right to me. Later, I found the answer, a citation, and a source. And in the end, my RefSchool contact said the answer in the software was indeed erroneous. Problem solved.

Snaq, I think you're right about "reading too much into it." It's one simple question, folks, and on a test, a rookie gets the same amount of points as a veteran.

The rookie never gets the same number of points as the rookie. Just sayin

[Adam]

Originally Posted by Back In The Saddle

The rookie never gets the same number of points as the rookie. Just sayin

????
Yogi?

[mbyron]

Originally Posted by Snaqwells

????
Yogi?

Doesn't matter, 'cause he's just sayin.

[Adam]

Originally Posted by mbyron

Doesn't matter, 'cause he's just sayin.

I know, right?

[Back In The Saddle]

Originally Posted by Snaqwells

????
Yogi?

You cut me so deep.

[Adam]

Originally Posted by Back In The Saddle

You cut me so deep.

Need a hug?

[Back In The Saddle]

Originally Posted by Snaqwells

Need a hug?

Actually, it appears I need a really long nap.

But if a hug is the best you can do...

[M&M Guy]

Geeze guys, get a room.

[Jurassic Referee]

Originally Posted by bainsey

And in the end, my RefSchool contact said the answer in the software was indeed erroneous. Problem solved.

Not really. The consensus on this forum is that you, RefSchool and your "high ranking interpreter that assists with RefSchool" buddy are all full of sh!t. Not one person here has agreed with you. We all thought the correct answer should be "no" as per the reasoning and cites already given to you.

Quite simply, we do NOT direct the timer to start the replacement interval IF a TO request is granted to keep the player with blood on their uni in the game. There is NO replacement interval in that situation. The cite is NFHS rules 3-3-7 and 3-3-7NOTES: (ARTS: 6, 7) 2.

But if you feel that the problem is solved, I'm personally quite happy to go along with that. It's a waste of time trying to explain anything to you anyway imo.

[bainsey]

Originally Posted by Jurassic Referee

Quite simply, we do NOT direct the timer to start the replacement interval IF a TO request is granted to keep the player with blood on their uni in the game.

Again, the question never once mentioned a time out, period.

The consensus on this forum is that you, RefSchool and your "high ranking interpreter that assists with RefSchool" buddy are all full of sh!t.

Wow, first name-calling, then cursing out? And you desire respect?

Why do I have Sara Bareilles in my head right now?

[Jurassic Referee]

Originally Posted by bainsey

Again, the question never once mentioned a time out, period.


Wow, first name-calling, then cursing out? And you desire respect?

Why do I have Sara Bareilles in my head right now?

No, the question didn't mention a TO. But the fact that the coach has the legal right by rule to call a TO first to keep his player in the game has to be factored into the correct answer to the question. If he does that, there is NO replacement interval. And that possible scenario makes the correct answer 'NO". It's "NO" because "YES" doesn't cover ALL of the possible situations that might be encountered. It is NOT 100% certain that the official will instruct the timer to start the 20-second clock for a replacement under ALL of the possible circumstances. And that's what you can't get through your thick, smug little skull. And I could care less about getting respect from a wise-azz no-nothing semi-rookie like you. Get some spit built up in your whistle and then maybe I'll take you seriously. It's sureashell awfully hard to do that now considering some of the stoopid arguments you're known for bringing up on different forums.

Feel free to dismiss all of the above also. It's expected.

And btw, Sara Bareilles is just about all that you have in your head.