Alternating Possession Question NFHS

[Back In The Saddle]

Originally Posted by CDurham

Would you count the goal, then give the ball POI to team B if the goal is successful or go to the AP throw in if unsuccessful??

Half right. Okay, really you are entirely right, but there is a point to be made as regards your verbiage and the thinking it implies.

With a double foul you always resume play at the POI. In the case of a made basket, the POI is a throw-in anywhere along the end line for B. If the basket is missed, the POI is the AP arrow.

My point is that POI and AP arrow are not different answers. The AP arrow is one of the possible ways to resume play when utilizing the POI rule.

[CDurham]

Originally Posted by Back In The Saddle

Half right. Okay, really you are entirely right, but there is a point to be made as regards your verbiage and the thinking it implies.

With a double foul you always resume play at the POI. In the case of a made basket, the POI is a throw-in anywhere along the end line for B. If the basket is missed, the POI is the AP arrow.

My point is that POI and AP arrow are not different answers. The AP arrow is one of the possible ways to resume play when utilizing the POI rule.

Thanks. Is it possible to have a double foul with a airborne shooter? I know you can have is it a false double??

[Jurassic Referee]

Originally Posted by CDurham

Is it possible to have a double foul with a airborne shooter?

Yes, but highly unlikely. Very highly unlikely.

[Adam]

Originally Posted by Jurassic Referee

Yes, but highly unlikely. Very highly unlikely.

True, but it's not required in order to have the shot count.

You know that, but I'm offering the clarification for those who may not.

[Zoochy]

Originally Posted by CDurham

Thanks. Is it possible to have a double foul with a airborne shooter? I know you can have is it a false double??

Is a Blarge a double foul?

[CDurham]

Originally Posted by Zoochy

Is a Blarge a double foul?

Yes. In my DI scrimmage last Saturday we had the Trail go straight into the player control foul and going the other way. The Lead on the other hand has a foul but doesnt give his signal, but he has a block (I know this is different than both giving signals). The Lead gets with the Trail and they decide to with the Trails call. The Lead was the referee and seemed like he wanted to go with his foul, but thought otherwise and since the Trail gave his signal we went with his.

It was a great Blarge administration experience.

[just another ref]

Originally Posted by CDurham

Yes. In my DI scrimmage last Saturday we had the Trail go straight into the player control foul and going the other way. The Lead on the other hand has a foul but doesnt give his signal, but he has a block (I know this is different than both giving signals). The Lead gets with the Trail and they decide to with the Trails call. The Lead was the referee and seemed like he wanted to go with his foul, but thought otherwise and since the Trail gave his signal we went with his.

Why?

[CDurham]

Originally Posted by just another ref

Why?

Well if you have 2 giving signals then everyone has seen it and you have no choice to go with the Double. But if only 1 has given their signal then you have a chance to just penalize theirs if the other official agress, rather than going with the Double in the instance of both giving their signal.

I meant to say that this situation is different than both officials giving their preliminary signals, because only 1 gave theirs in my scrimmage.

[just another ref]

Originally Posted by CDurham

Well if you have 2 giving signals then everyone has seen it and you have no choice to go with the Double. But if only 1 has given their signal then you have a chance to just penalize theirs if the other official agress, rather than going with the Double in the instance of both giving their signal.

And all this is based on what?

[Back In The Saddle]

Yes, it is possible to have a double foul involving an airborne shooter. It is also possible to have a false double foul involving an airborne shooter.