whats the call

[justrunnin]

A-1 has 2 free throws for a shooting foul,,,,,shoots,,,ball lays on the rim,,,while A-2 commits a personel foul in the lane,,free throw goes in,,,what happens in that situation,,i just saw it tonight @ am curious if the correct call was made,,,what would u all call,,,,,thanks for the responses

[just another ref]

Free throw is good. Shoot the second with no players on the lane, then penalize the foul accordingly.

[Nevadaref]

JAR is correct.
Now the question to ask is why are the players fouling each other during the 1st of two FT attempts? There's not going to be a rebound.

[mbyron]

Originally Posted by Nevadaref

JAR is correct.
Now the question to ask is why are the players fouling each other during the 1st of two FT attempts? There's not going to be a rebound.

The OP didn't say it was about a rebound. Could have been about hairstyle choices, or mother-related comments.

[Adam]

Originally Posted by justrunnin

A-1 has 2 free throws for a shooting foul,,,,,shoots,,,ball lays on the rim,,,while A-2 commits a personel foul in the lane,,free throw goes in,,,what happens in that situation,,i just saw it tonight @ am curious if the correct call was made,,,what would u all call,,,,,thanks for the responses

what did the officials do?

[M&M Guy]

Originally Posted by mbyron

The OP didn't say it was about a rebound. Could have been about hairstyle choices, or mother-related comments.

Hmm...aren't those more like to result in technical fouls?

[mbyron]

Originally Posted by M&M Guy

Hmm...aren't those more likely to result in technical fouls?

I'm sure you're right about the probabilities. I was challenging Nevada's assumption that the fouls were due to rebounding after the first of two.

[Nevadaref]

Originally Posted by mbyron

I'm sure you're right about the probabilities. I was challenging Nevada's assumption that the fouls were due to rebounding after the first of two.

Did you note that the OP wrote, "commits a personel [sic] foul in the lane?"

[mbyron]

Originally Posted by Nevadaref

Did you note that the OP wrote, "commits a personel [sic] foul in the lane?"

Yes. Because the ball is live during a free throw attempt, it is possible to commit a personal foul, even though it's the first of two attempts.

I'm not arguing with your main point, which might be that it's a dumb time for a foul.

[Multiple Sports]

Originally Posted by justrunnin

A-1 has 2 free throws for a shooting foul,,,,,shoots,,,ball lays on the rim,,,while A-2 commits a personel foul in the lane,,free throw goes in,,,what happens in that situation,,i just saw it tonight @ am curious if the correct call was made,,,what would u all call,,,,,thanks for the responses

Was there any chance that the foul could have been ruled intentional or a technical ?????

Was B-2 just standing there and got shoved ?????

[Jurassic Referee]

Originally Posted by Multiple Sports

Was there any chance that the foul could have been ruled intentional or a technical ?????

Was B-2 just standing there and got shoved ?????

Zero chance that a technical foul of any kind could be called. The rules don't allow us to assess "T"s for contact fouls during a live ball.

An intentional personal foul is always a judgment call to be made by the calling official.