![]() |
|
|
|||
Two thoughts:
1. Game control. If the contact is significant to warrant consideration for excessive contact and it "turns up the heat" unnecessarily, if there's no good reason for it, if the outcome is already decided, if there's a history going on...I'm calling it intentional to send a clear message. 2. We call lots of fouls where there is clean contact with the ball. The ball is not the only consideration. And if the defender can't make that clean play on the ball without creating excessive contact...it should be called.
__________________
"It is not enough to do your best; you must know what to do, and then do your best." - W. Edwards Deming |
|
|||
Did you ask the Center official for information? A lot of intentional fouls occur on fastbreak plays off of turnovers. In my opinion, the Center will have the best look on whether an upgrade to intentional or flagrant is warranted.
Sometimes, we can have intentional fouls that are legitimate plays on the ball based on excessive contact. If the observer jumped you on this, I would at least consider the merits of what they said. |
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
Rock, Paper, Scissors ???
What? Are you saying that you can't just stop the game and conduct a poll?
__________________
"For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life." (John 3:16) “I was in prison and you came to visit me.” (Matthew 25:36) |
|
|||
And the larger the crowd, the larger the sample size and the more accurate the outcome!
|
|
|||
Quote:
I will express no personal opinion on this whatsoever. I'm merely relaying the information. |
|
|||
Quote:
You already know mine. |
|
|||
Quote:
The rationale given 2 explain that makes some sense. The first being it is better/easier to 'upgrade' a foul than to 'downgrade' a foul. Similar to you cant "uneject' someone. Secondly, it gives the perception that the crew is working together, that eyes were on the play and the calling official has the information they need to come to a proper decision about 'upgrading'. Further, the process is not dissimilar to an official providing additional information about an OB. Official comes in, provides info to calling official, calling official then decides whether or not to change call. I like it, but thenagain, I am a big fan of the officiating crew having as much information as they can get. This type of foul, like some tech's IMO, is rare enough that having these quick consults warrant the 'one off' type situation being espoused. |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
second intentional | rsl | Basketball | 10 | Mon Mar 08, 2010 12:28pm |
Intentional and One | ranjo | Basketball | 21 | Sat Feb 27, 2010 01:49am |
Intentional...but not | bas2456 | Basketball | 1 | Sat Feb 06, 2010 02:26pm |
Intentional, or not intentional? | Al | Softball | 16 | Tue May 20, 2008 11:35pm |
INTENTIONAL OR | BOBBYMO | Basketball | 11 | Thu Jan 25, 2001 10:29am |