![]() |
|
|
|
|||
|
yeah, but if the defender truly IS completly cleanly vertical (I know, this rarely happens in this situation), we can't penalize the defender for merely jumping straight up in his own vertical plane. just my thoughts...
|
|
|||
|
OP says defender is "way past vertical"
VBZebra - if you get a chance, read the thread I linked to the OP - this situation has been well discussed... It's just that this play happened again this morning....and the defender was crying about it....as they usually do. |
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
|||
|
Quote:
If the defender leaves his vertical plane, and comes crashing down on someone, it's on him. |
|
|||
|
I don't think you get this play right unless you referee the defense (as we should be doing). If the defender is moving horizontally into the offensive shooters space, defensive foul is the correct call. If the offensive player initiates the contact then you have a no-call or offense if the contact is severe. Be prepared to take a boatload of heat for getting this play right! Have faith that the film will validate your correct call.
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Non-controversial thread . . . I promise | greymule | Baseball | 20 | Fri Dec 21, 2007 10:19pm |
| Controversial Interference Call | SAump | Baseball | 19 | Sun May 13, 2007 11:24pm |
| The Controversial Center Circle | rainmaker | Basketball | 9 | Mon Jan 17, 2005 09:39am |
| Controversial Umpire Calls in Red Sox Vs. NY | Gre144 | Baseball | 6 | Sat Oct 23, 2004 08:44am |
| Controversial calls... | WindyCityBlue | General / Off-Topic | 35 | Mon Oct 11, 2004 01:16pm |