![]() |
|
|
|
|||
|
Here's the play:
YouTube - Mater Dei vs. Etiwanda -- No-call on game-tying three-point attempt I saw this game and what you have to understand is that this all took place with about 5 seconds left in the game. The ball was being inbounded after a made FT by White. The Black inbound pass was made near the baseline and pass receiver took two dribbles and passed it to a teammate at half-court. The black player who received the pass at halfcourt quickly passed it to his teammate on the wing in front of his bench. What you see is the aftermath from that pass. The final horn went off after the shot was released. The closest person with a look at the play was the L who was standing on the baseline. The C had to officiate the play (pass to the wing) at half court and when the shot by black went up, the C had about 3 players blocking the view of the attempted shot. The T was still running up in the backcourt about FT line extended. It was a play where the crew should've known that a 3pt shot was the only play that black was going to attempt. In my opinion, the L should not have been standing at the baseline; he should've have been about 2 feet away from the closest player to him anywhere near the 3pt line. I think he missed because he was too far away from the black player and that the contact happened on the far side of where he could see. |
|
||||
|
Quote:
If the L was on the ballside here, there's no reason at all he can't get this foul from the baseline. We all know that in transition the L may need to help out here. I can't see the L being further up the court on this shot, though. The shooter and defender aren't exactly at half court here. |
|
|||
|
Quote:
In my opinion, the L should not be at the baseline and should be about 2 feet away from the deepest 3pt threat on his side. With 5 seconds left, a ball going out of bounds on the baseline is not as important as finding your closest competitive matchup for an obvious 3pt shot attempt to tie the game. |
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
|||
|
Quote:
Being closer (say between the FT line and the baseline) along the key and the L would have had a great angle at the play. |
|
|||
|
Quote:
I'm a proponent of "go where you have to to officiate the play" but there are a LOT better places to officiate a potential 3-point shot than in the lane.
|
|
|||
|
Quote:
You might be right on this play. But, suppose the same setup and someone came running out from the block at the shooter. Now, if the official was inside, he'd be straightlined on that contact and you'd (or some would) be arguing that the official should be wide to see between the players. |
|
|||
|
Quote:
If the ball is in the frontcourt, there is no reason for the L to be anywhere but the endline for many reason, not the least of which is that being right next to a play is rarely the best place to be to officiate it. |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Obvious mudball | cc6 | Baseball | 18 | Sat Apr 04, 2009 12:21am |
| Obvious call redux | outathm | Softball | 12 | Sat Nov 03, 2007 04:12pm |
| No call on the obvious | IRISHMAFIA | Softball | 13 | Fri Nov 02, 2007 11:35am |
| blatantly obvious | CecilOne | Softball | 8 | Tue May 02, 2006 09:00am |
| the obvious | lrpalmer3 | Basketball | 17 | Sun Jan 02, 2005 09:27am |