The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Mon Mar 01, 2010, 04:39pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 592
Seems kinda odd that only the assistant coach is quoted. Thought I was eventually going to read the head coach was tossed.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Tue Mar 02, 2010, 08:45am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 280
Update

Got more details. The fouls were for 1) unsporting conduct and 2)for touching or dislodging the ball on a throw-in. Apparently the calling official said he didn't want to eject the kid for the second T so he didn't! The state association has a rule that disqualification for two technicals means a suspension, so they rsuspended him for the next playoff game anyway.

This all apparently happened in the first quarter and the kid went on to score a boatload. The opposing coach must be beside himself.

Tournament officials, too.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Tue Mar 02, 2010, 09:14am
Adam's Avatar
Keeper of the HAMMER
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: MST
Posts: 27,190
From whom did you get those details?
__________________
Sprinkles are for winners.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Tue Mar 02, 2010, 11:17am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 280
here you go

Quote:
Originally Posted by Snaqwells View Post
From whom did you get those details?
take your pick

Lynn English's Woumn hit with 1-game suspension - The Boston Globe

Lynn English star suspended - BostonHerald.com

Krause: Don't blame MIAA for English predicament

Bulldogs' Woumn suspended, but Prep still has tall order - SalemNews.com, Salem, MA

apparently this school has some kind of recruiting scandal on top of all this
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Tue Mar 02, 2010, 11:23am
Adam's Avatar
Keeper of the HAMMER
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: MST
Posts: 27,190
Well then, this is what happens when officials insert their own opinions into the rules. I'm not a fan of the MIAA (handshakes), but they did the right thing here.
__________________
Sprinkles are for winners.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Tue Mar 02, 2010, 09:16am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 242
Ah, yes, here it is!

Quote:
Originally Posted by amusedofficial View Post
Apparently the calling official said he didn't want to eject the kid for the second T so he didn't! T
Found the applicable rule:

10-3-PENALTY-NOTE-EXCEPTION: If the official who charges a single flagrant technical foul or the second technical foul isn't in the mood to disqualify the offending player, then 10-3-PENALTY-NOTE doesn't apply, and the player may continue playing.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Tue Mar 02, 2010, 10:31am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: New York City
Posts: 322
Quote:
Originally Posted by sseltser View Post
Found the applicable rule:

10-3-PENALTY-NOTE-EXCEPTION: If the official who charges a single flagrant technical foul or the second technical foul isn't in the mood to disqualify the offending player, then 10-3-PENALTY-NOTE doesn't apply, and the player may continue playing.
I'm in a particularly gullible mood this morning and don't have my books in the office; I assume this is a joke lol...
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Tue Mar 02, 2010, 10:25am
In Memoriam
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Hell
Posts: 20,211
Quote:
Originally Posted by amusedofficial View Post
Got more details. The fouls were for 1) unsporting conduct and 2)for touching or dislodging the ball on a throw-in. Apparently the calling official said he didn't want to eject the kid for the second T so he didn't! The state association has a rule that disqualification for two technicals means a suspension, so they suspended him for the next playoff game anyway.

This all apparently happened in the first quarter and the kid went on to score a boatload. The opposing coach must be beside himself.

Tournament officials, too.
Oh my.......
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Tue Mar 02, 2010, 10:40am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,842
Quote:
Originally Posted by amusedofficial View Post
Got more details. The fouls were for 1) unsporting conduct and 2)for touching or dislodging the ball on a throw-in. Apparently the calling official said he didn't want to eject the kid for the second T so he didn't! The state association has a rule that disqualification for two technicals means a suspension, so they rsuspended him for the next playoff game anyway.

This all apparently happened in the first quarter and the kid went on to score a boatload. The opposing coach must be beside himself.

Tournament officials, too.

Can you get a follow up on this? In my neck of the woods, that official could be toast for any tournament games in the coming years.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Tue Mar 02, 2010, 10:45am
In Memoriam
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Hell
Posts: 20,211
Quote:
Originally Posted by fullor30 View Post
Can you get a follow up on this? In my neck of the woods, that official could be toast for any tournament games in the coming years.
If true, that might be correct for most necks of the woods.

The bottom line is that you should just follow the rules in cases like this. Never inject your own personal beliefs. Let the governing body decide what they want to do next. That's their job, not our's.

JMO....
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Tue Mar 02, 2010, 10:57am
Adam's Avatar
Keeper of the HAMMER
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: MST
Posts: 27,190
My first year officiating high school ball, I had a boys soph game in which I had this very scenario. Early in the game I give him a T for reaching across and slapping the ball on a throw-in. Later, I have to ring him up for complaining about a no-call.
When I called the state to file the report, they said they weren't concerned about it and wouldn't suspend him since only one T fit what they considered to be a sportsmanship issue.

Granted, it wasn't a playoff game, but still....
__________________
Sprinkles are for winners.
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Tue Mar 02, 2010, 11:14am
biz biz is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 221
This happened in my neck of the woods...I do not know who worked the game, but I will see if I can find out what the deal is.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old Tue Mar 02, 2010, 12:14pm
Courageous When Prudent
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Hampton Roads, VA
Posts: 14,956
Quote:
Originally Posted by Snaqwells View Post
My first year officiating high school ball, I had a boys soph game in which I had this very scenario. Early in the game I give him a T for reaching across and slapping the ball on a throw-in. Later, I have to ring him up for complaining about a no-call.
When I called the state to file the report, they said they weren't concerned about it and wouldn't suspend him since only one T fit what they considered to be a sportsmanship issue.

Granted, it wasn't a playoff game, but still....
I can understand the state's thinking in this matter...they were going with the "spirit and intent".

I personally think this particular 'T' should be a Team Technical or an Indirect to the player. But I don't write the rules.
__________________
A-hole formerly known as BNR
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old Wed Mar 03, 2010, 08:49am
biz biz is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 221
Update on this story. Lynn English lost its next game in the tournament by one. Most definitely would have been a different game if Woumn played, but that's the way the cookie crumbles.

The only word I have on the officials is that all 3 are supposedly college officials. I wouldn't take that information to the bank, but it raises a question for me. I'm not very familiar with NCAA rules, so I'm wondering if the T for reaching through the plane and making contact with the ball carries a different penalty in NCAA-M or NCAA-W?

I know we have plenty of NCAA officials out there who can set me straight.
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old Tue Mar 02, 2010, 11:36am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 7,620
Quote:
Originally Posted by fullor30 View Post
Can you get a follow up on this? In my neck of the woods, that official could be toast for any tournament games in the coming years.
And what about that official's partners, who conspired in this travesty? Seems that plenty of toast should be in the offing.
__________________
Cheers,
mb
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Mass High School Tourney problems hoopguy Basketball 48 Mon Mar 03, 2008 12:46pm
Benefits of Western Mass ChuckElias Basketball 5 Fri Jan 18, 2002 01:57pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:32am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1