The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Mon Feb 08, 2010, 11:14pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 14,995
KU @ Texas

Thoughts on:
1. Review and intentional technical on Aldrich.
2. Morningstar's FT attempt for Aldrich (fouled out with the T).
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Mon Feb 08, 2010, 11:20pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,230
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nevadaref View Post
Thoughts on:
1. Review and intentional technical on Aldrich.
2. Morningstar's FT attempt for Aldrich (fouled out with the T).
I personally don't understand the technical... I thought it looked as though the torso moved with the elbows.

Was Aldrich T a class B then? So they shoot them after the 1-and-1

-Josh
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Mon Feb 08, 2010, 11:26pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Illinois
Posts: 862
Watching it real time, I'm not so sure the elbows came after the whistle. Seems like they were simultaneous.

Couldn't they just say intentional or flagrant foul then?

I'm not too familiar with NCAA rules...
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Mon Feb 08, 2010, 11:40pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 1,896
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nevadaref View Post
Thoughts on:
1. Review and intentional technical on Aldrich.
2. Morningstar's FT attempt for Aldrich (fouled out with the T).
1. Thought it was probably the right call.

2. That was pretty funny. Don't think I've seen that one before.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Mon Feb 08, 2010, 11:55pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 73
1. I thought the elbow wasn't swinging faster than the torso. If the fouls occurred the same time, would have gone with the double personal. Apparently they did not. In which case, yes, intentional technical was the right call for dead ball contact.

2. Ref should have whistled it dead as soon as the ball popped out of his hand. Looked like a try. Never seen that happen before.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Tue Feb 09, 2010, 12:01am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 14,995
My take

1. The left elbow was purposely swung at the opponent. He extended.
The ball became dead when the player from Texas fouled. The timing of the whistle doesn't matter. Therefore, this is an intentional technical foul. In NCAAM, an INT T for dead ball contact is administered in the order of occurrence, in the NFHS manner, because possession to the opponent at the division line is also awarded.

2. Should have been whistled dead when the thrower's foot broke the plane of the FT line. The loss of the ball is okay as long as he can catch it again without violating.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Tue Feb 09, 2010, 12:05am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 1,896
Agree with your take Nevada. Pretty sure the officials were as caught off guard on the FT attempt as I was!
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Tue Feb 09, 2010, 12:24am
Rich's Avatar
Get away from me, Steve.
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 15,770
I watched the second half while loathing my elliptical machine.

There was a drive to the bucket where the player was gathering, fouled, and finished. The official counted the bucket, correctly. Bob Knight, of course, disagreed with this.

Real time I thought, "They'll go to the monitor and call it a dead ball technical foul" and I was right. There have been a few of these the past week and regardless of the player landing on the Kansas player, I *did* think the elbow came around faster than the torso.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Tue Feb 09, 2010, 12:26am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Mizzouah!
Posts: 352
I think John Adams wants this contact to be a Technical this year. I do not have my rule books, but I think I saw it on the NCAA pre-season bulletin
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Tue Feb 09, 2010, 12:28am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Illinois
Posts: 862
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nevadaref View Post
1. The left elbow was purposely swung at the opponent. He extended.
The ball became dead when the player from Texas fouled. The timing of the whistle doesn't matter. Therefore, this is an intentional technical foul. In NCAAM, an INT T for dead ball contact is administered in the order of occurrence, in the NFHS manner, because possession to the opponent at the division line is also awarded.

2. Should have been whistled dead when the thrower's foot broke the plane of the FT line. The loss of the ball is okay as long as he can catch it again without violating.
I see.

It's the same in NFHS, I looked it up. I agree then.
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Tue Feb 09, 2010, 12:33am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 14,995
Quote:
Originally Posted by RichMSN View Post
There was a drive to the bucket where the player was gathering, fouled, and finished. The official counted the bucket, correctly. Bob Knight, of course, disagreed with this.
While the player had ended his dribble, I don't believe that he had done anything to start his shooting motion prior to the foul. I agreed with Knight. This was not a foul in the act of shooting.
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Tue Feb 09, 2010, 12:37am
Rich's Avatar
Get away from me, Steve.
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 15,770
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nevadaref View Post
While the player had ended his dribble, I don't believe that he had done anything to start his shooting motion prior to the foul. I agreed with Knight. This was not a foul in the act of shooting.
He was gathering it to start a shooting motion -- to me, that was part of starting the habitual motion that precedes the release of the ball. Matter of fact, I watched it a second time -- the ball was already in both hands and he was in the process of taking it up.

I'm counting that every time.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old Tue Feb 09, 2010, 12:39am
Rich's Avatar
Get away from me, Steve.
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 15,770
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nevadaref View Post
The timing of the whistle doesn't matter.
You mean like when someone requests and is then granted a timeout?
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old Tue Feb 09, 2010, 12:40am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 14,995
Quote:
Originally Posted by RichMSN View Post
He was gathering it to start a shooting motion -- to me, that was part of starting the habitual motion that precedes the release of the ball. Matter of fact, I watched it a second time -- the ball was already in both hands and he was in the process of taking it up.

I'm counting that every time.
How do you know that he wasn't gathering his dribble to pass?

In my opinion, simply gathering the dribble is not enough. The official needs to see some kind of habitual motion that is part of the shooting action prior to the release of a try in order to award FTs.

Just what I take from the rules.
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old Tue Feb 09, 2010, 12:46am
Rich's Avatar
Get away from me, Steve.
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 15,770
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nevadaref View Post
How do you know that he wasn't gathering his dribble to pass?
He didn't pass?

Admittedly, it's a fine line.

I've watched a lot of NCAAM the past few weeks (mostly recorded games as I've been working) and it seems like they are calling more of these shooting fouls than I remember in the past.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Texas Ban Snake~eyes Football 4 Mon May 09, 2005 01:56pm
Texas T dragonref Basketball 15 Mon Mar 29, 2004 09:01am
Texas vs Texas Tech Play carldog Basketball 7 Tue Jan 27, 2004 04:56pm
Texas whiskers_ump Softball 7 Mon Feb 11, 2002 04:14pm
Texas/Texas Tech officials johnSandlin Basketball 4 Wed Jan 16, 2002 01:05am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:35am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1