Inbound pass goes to team mate OOB

[Hardwood]

A1 is attempting to inbound the ball from the endline. He throws the ball to A2 who is standing with one foot out of bounds on the sideline. Where his the subsequent throw-in spot?
(I know this has been asked and answered, but I can not find the thread.)

[just another ref]

B's ball at the spot where it was touched by A2.

[David M]

I believe the throw in would be at the original spot.

[Adam]

Originally Posted by David M

I believe the throw in would be at the original spot.

This use to be the case; no longer. It was an unannounced change of a little known rule. This is not a throwin violation, it's an OOB violation on the receiver of the pass.

[Camron Rust]

Originally Posted by Snaqwells

This use to be the case; no longer. It was an unannounced change of a little known rule. This is not a throwin violation, it's an OOB violation on the receiver of the pass.

Well, sort of. It was a shortlived rule. It was always at the spot of A2, then a case play came about that made it a throwin violation and put it at the spot of the throw in. But that didn't make sense if B2 was the one to have touched the ball and it only lasted just 1-2 years before it was reversed to what it had been forever.

[Adam]

Originally Posted by Camron Rust

Well, sort of. It was a shortlived rule. It was always at the spot of A2, then a case play came about that made it a throwin violation and put it at the spot of the throw in. But that didn't make sense if B2 was the one to have touched the ball and it only lasted just 1-2 years before it was reversed to what it had been forever.

I was thinking it was a slight editorial change in the rules and penalties. I do remember the change came shortly after someone in here (Nevada?) posted the rule/case. No one here knew of the original change, but we were all over it when they changed it back.

[representing]

Originally Posted by Snaqwells

This use to be the case; no longer. It was an unannounced change of a little known rule. This is not a throwin violation, it's an OOB violation on the receiver of the pass.

No time taken off of clock, right?

[Nevadaref]

Originally Posted by representing

No time taken off of clock, right?

I disagree. The touching itself was legal. The position of the player was not. The game clock should start and stop very quickly.