The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jan 12, 2010, 11:13am
Rich's Avatar
Get away from me, Steve.
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 15,779
Oklahoma / Oklahoma St.

Was watching last night while getting in some time on the elliptical. Three really bizarre calls (of course, I may have not been paying attention close enough) in about a minute -- was wondering if anyone saw the game.

(1) Free throw. Rebound goes long and bounces off a players hands. Player from A in his frontcourt secures the ball in midair and lands in the backcourt.

(2) Lead calls an out of bounds violation for a player stepping on the line. The player never came within a foot of the line -- they showed the replay twice and the announcers didn't say much about it at all (and one of them was Bobby Knight).

(3) Same thing at the other end. Also appeared the player never stepped out on replay.

Am I missing a rules exception on (1)? Maybe I just saw it wrong.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jan 12, 2010, 12:04pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 1,342
I didn't see the entire game. However, what you describe in situation 1. There was no team control so no BC violation.
__________________
truerookie
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jan 12, 2010, 12:07pm
Rich's Avatar
Get away from me, Steve.
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 15,779
Quote:
Originally Posted by truerookie View Post
I didn't see the entire game. However, what you describe in situation 1. There was no team control so no BC violation.
Is there an exception allowing the A player to gain control with frontcourt status here (he took off in the front court, got possession in mid air, and landed in the backcourt)?

Clearly I'm just having a brain cramp here, which means it's good time to sign off and go to the gym over lunch.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jan 12, 2010, 12:07pm
Adam's Avatar
Keeper of the HAMMER
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: MST
Posts: 27,190
Quote:
Originally Posted by truerookie View Post
I didn't see the entire game. However, what you describe in situation 1. There was no team control so no BC violation.
Team control is established as soon as the player catches the ball.
Since he is airborne, the ball has now gained FC status as well. As soon as he lands in the BC, it's a violation.
__________________
Sprinkles are for winners.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jan 12, 2010, 12:08pm
Adam's Avatar
Keeper of the HAMMER
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: MST
Posts: 27,190
Rich, the way I read your play, this should be a violation; unless the NCAA has extended the exception to cover all plays in which team control is initially established by an airborne player.
__________________
Sprinkles are for winners.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jan 12, 2010, 12:10pm
Rich's Avatar
Get away from me, Steve.
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 15,779
Quote:
Originally Posted by Snaqwells View Post
Rich, the way I read your play, this should be a violation; unless the NCAA has extended the exception to cover all plays in which team control is initially established by an airborne player.
I guess that's my question. I only work 3-5 NCAA-rules games a year and I've read through the rulebook, but I missed this exception, if it exists.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jan 12, 2010, 12:14pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 18,019
Quote:
Originally Posted by RichMSN View Post
I guess that's my question. I only work 3-5 NCAA-rules games a year and I've read through the rulebook, but I missed this exception, if it exists.

AR217 (1) is this exact play. The ruling says, in part, : Violation ... The exception for the backcourt rules are only applicable for the player who made the initial touch on the ball.

So, as described, they kicked it.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jan 12, 2010, 12:16pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 1,342
Quote:
Originally Posted by bob jenkins View Post
AR217 (1) is this exact play. The ruling says, in part, : Violation ... The exception for the backcourt rules are only applicable for the player who made the initial touch on the ball.

So, as described, they kicked it.
So, Bob are you saying it is a violation?
__________________
truerookie
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jan 12, 2010, 12:20pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 18,019
Quote:
Originally Posted by truerookie View Post
So, Bob are you saying it is a violation?
Sigh.

The ruling says, in part, : Violation
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jan 12, 2010, 12:28pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 1,342
Quote:
Originally Posted by bob jenkins View Post
Sigh.

The ruling says, in part, : Violation

Have you had you coffee, tea or hot chocolate today???
__________________
truerookie
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jan 12, 2010, 12:31pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: WI
Posts: 825
Quote:
Originally Posted by truerookie View Post
Have you had you coffee, tea or hot chocolate today???
double mocha cappacino?
__________________
When I want your opinion - I'll give it to you!
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jan 12, 2010, 12:32pm
Rich's Avatar
Get away from me, Steve.
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 15,779
Does NFHS 9-9-3 apply to a rebound of a free throw? If so, why do they only list "defensive player or during a jump ball or throw-in" in parentheses?

Is this covered in the case book (it's in the car)?
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jan 12, 2010, 12:34pm
Adam's Avatar
Keeper of the HAMMER
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: MST
Posts: 27,190
Yes, it's in the case book, and it only applies during throw-ins, jump balls, and to "defensive players." Rebounds not included. 9.9.1D
__________________
Sprinkles are for winners.
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jan 12, 2010, 12:41pm
Rich's Avatar
Get away from me, Steve.
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 15,779
So the NCAA rule is different. If the A player was the first to touch, in midair, on the rebound, he could catch with frontcourt status and land in the backcourt.

I wish I could see it yet again -- I'm 95% certain, though, it hit players hands and was tipped up into the air before being caught by the A player.
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jan 12, 2010, 01:23pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 18,019
Quote:
Originally Posted by RichMSN View Post
So the NCAA rule is different. If the A player was the first to touch, in midair, on the rebound, he could catch with frontcourt status and land in the backcourt.

I wish I could see it yet again -- I'm 95% certain, though, it hit players hands and was tipped up into the air before being caught by the A player.

My mistake. The AR is on a throw-in.

Still a violation.

Yes, I'd have a violation.

I also think it's the "wrong" ruling (that is, I'd like to see the ruling changed).
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
OKlahoma ronald Softball 13 Wed Jun 10, 2009 11:16am
Texas A&M vs Oklahoma CK Basketball 7 Sun Feb 01, 2009 01:39pm
Oklahoma @ Oklahoma State Game GoodwillRef Basketball 6 Tue Jan 27, 2009 11:04am
Oklahoma-LSU game c it first Football 10 Thu Jan 08, 2004 09:21am
Semi-Pro in Oklahoma Poosh Football 3 Wed May 14, 2003 02:51pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:56pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1