|
||||
Quote:
Clearly I'm just having a brain cramp here, which means it's good time to sign off and go to the gym over lunch. |
|
||||
Quote:
Since he is airborne, the ball has now gained FC status as well. As soon as he lands in the BC, it's a violation.
__________________
Sprinkles are for winners. |
|
||||
Rich, the way I read your play, this should be a violation; unless the NCAA has extended the exception to cover all plays in which team control is initially established by an airborne player.
__________________
Sprinkles are for winners. |
|
|||
Quote:
AR217 (1) is this exact play. The ruling says, in part, : Violation ... The exception for the backcourt rules are only applicable for the player who made the initial touch on the ball. So, as described, they kicked it. |
|
|||
So, Bob are you saying it is a violation?
__________________
truerookie |
|
||||
So the NCAA rule is different. If the A player was the first to touch, in midair, on the rebound, he could catch with frontcourt status and land in the backcourt.
I wish I could see it yet again -- I'm 95% certain, though, it hit players hands and was tipped up into the air before being caught by the A player. |
|
|||
Quote:
My mistake. The AR is on a throw-in. Still a violation. Yes, I'd have a violation. I also think it's the "wrong" ruling (that is, I'd like to see the ruling changed). |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
OKlahoma | ronald | Softball | 13 | Wed Jun 10, 2009 11:16am |
Texas A&M vs Oklahoma | CK | Basketball | 7 | Sun Feb 01, 2009 01:39pm |
Oklahoma @ Oklahoma State Game | GoodwillRef | Basketball | 6 | Tue Jan 27, 2009 11:04am |
Oklahoma-LSU game | c it first | Football | 10 | Thu Jan 08, 2004 09:21am |
Semi-Pro in Oklahoma | Poosh | Football | 3 | Wed May 14, 2003 02:51pm |