Oklahoma / Oklahoma St.

[Adam]

Rich, the way I read your play, this should be a violation; unless the NCAA has extended the exception to cover all plays in which team control is initially established by an airborne player.

[Rich]

Originally Posted by Snaqwells

Rich, the way I read your play, this should be a violation; unless the NCAA has extended the exception to cover all plays in which team control is initially established by an airborne player.

I guess that's my question. I only work 3-5 NCAA-rules games a year and I've read through the rulebook, but I missed this exception, if it exists.

[bob jenkins]

Originally Posted by RichMSN

I guess that's my question. I only work 3-5 NCAA-rules games a year and I've read through the rulebook, but I missed this exception, if it exists.

AR217 (1) is this exact play. The ruling says, in part, : Violation ... The exception for the backcourt rules are only applicable for the player who made the initial touch on the ball.

So, as described, they kicked it.

[truerookie]

Originally Posted by bob jenkins

AR217 (1) is this exact play. The ruling says, in part, : Violation ... The exception for the backcourt rules are only applicable for the player who made the initial touch on the ball.

So, as described, they kicked it.

So, Bob are you saying it is a violation?

[bob jenkins]

Originally Posted by truerookie

So, Bob are you saying it is a violation?

Sigh.

The ruling says, in part, : Violation

[truerookie]

Originally Posted by bob jenkins

Sigh.

The ruling says, in part, : Violation

Have you had you coffee, tea or hot chocolate today???

[chartrusepengui]

Originally Posted by truerookie

Have you had you coffee, tea or hot chocolate today???

double mocha cappacino?

[Rich]

Does NFHS 9-9-3 apply to a rebound of a free throw? If so, why do they only list "defensive player or during a jump ball or throw-in" in parentheses?

Is this covered in the case book (it's in the car)?