Valid rule interpreation RE: backcourt violation

[jdmara]

I promise I'm not trying to open a can of worms. I couldn't remember if they came out with a different interpretation or not. We had this happen in the first half of our second game tonight and we discussed it over halftime. I didn't have my interpretations with me but I knew I had previously read this situation. Please lock this thread. Thanks

-Josh

[Adam]

Originally Posted by jdmara

I promise I'm not trying to open a can of worms. I couldn't remember if they came out with a different interpretation or not. We had this happen in the first half of our second game tonight and we discussed it over halftime. I didn't have my interpretations with me but I knew I had previously read this situation. Please lock this thread. Thanks

-Josh

Did you call the violation? The prevailing opinion here is that this runs contrary to the rule.

[jdmara]

Originally Posted by Snaqwells

Did you call the violation? The prevailing opinion here is that this runs contrary to the rule.

I was C and I did not go out of my PCA to call it.

-Josh

[jdmara]

Is there a contradictory interpretation for NCAA M or W? Just out of curiosity. Thanks

-Josh

[jdmara]

Forgive me if I reopened the topic. I know it was a hot topic but I thought they truly came out with another interpretation but I couldn't find one.

-Josh

[Camron Rust]

Originally Posted by jdmara

Forgive me if I reopened the topic. I know it was a hot topic but I thought they truly came out with another interpretation but I couldn't find one.

-Josh

Recent versions of rules committees have been notorious for coming up with rulings that are either not support by or are even contradictory with the rules....and they don't correct them either.

[mbyron]

Originally Posted by jdmara

Please lock this thread. Thanks

-Josh

If you wish to delete the thread, just delete your opening post. The entire thread will go.