Advantage/Disadvantage

[Smitty]

Originally Posted by mbyron

To my mind, this statement is not saying that hand checks are in some sense "automatic" independent of whether they create an illegal advantage.

Rather, it gives examples of how hand checking creates an illegal advantage and thus why hand checks need to be called more.

Helping officials recognize advantage/disadvantage is different from announcing "automatic" fouls, IMO. Officials and coaches should not interpret this kind of statement as endorsing an "automatic" foul independent of advantage/disadvantage.

Really? Which parts of this:

Regardless of where it happens on the floor, when a player:
1) Continuously places a hand on the opposing player – it is a foul.
2) Places both hands on a player – it is a foul.
3) Continuously jabs a hand or forearm on an opponent – it is a foul.

are vague?

[Rich]

Originally Posted by Smitty

Really? Which parts of this:



are vague?

The word continuously is open for interpretation. The only automatic I see is "two hands" and I've been calling this for years (as have my partners).