![]() |
|
|||
I'm not a fan of the new mechanic partly for this reason. Switching every time just seems better to me. This new mechanic means you sometimes switch (no free throws or lead calling foul w/free throws) or sometimes you don't (trail calling foul w/free throws). It just hasn't felt comfortable for me yet.
|
|
||||
Quote:
In 2-person, you feel like you need to signal the table on the number of shots (with your back to it), count on the FT, raise your hand, step down, and still have the table responsibilities -- all this was easier when you were naturally looking at the table from opposite side. All in all, though, it's not really a huge deal. We haven't long-switched on a foul going the other way or any back court fouls in years, so not switching isn't a huge deal for me. |
|
|||
I don't care for the new mechanic for pretty much the same reasons Rich listed - glad Oregon is not using it.
__________________
Meddle not in the affairs of dragons - for thou art crunchy and taste good with ketchup! |
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
Being closer to the benches, having to look over my shoulder for subs, those don't bother me. But I have noticed numerous times this season where I feel like I've become "stuck" at one end and am making all the calls. I now pre-game that if I've had the last two fouls and gotten "stuck" at T, on the next one I'm going to force a switch.
I'll be interested to hear if the NFHS has anything to say about how wildly successful the new mechanic has been (or hasn't been). From my experience so far the anticipated positive of being nearer the coaches to address concerns has been outweighed by the actual negative of getting "stuck" at T thus giving the impression that, at times, one official is "calling the whole game" and reducing the benefits gained by switching making it more likely that one official really is calling the whole game, at least at one end.
__________________
"It is not enough to do your best; you must know what to do, and then do your best." - W. Edwards Deming |
|
|||
Quote:
![]()
__________________
A-hole formerly known as BNR |
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
I don't mind the new mechanic; one real positive is that we are ready for a free throw a lot quicker now. Not having to wait for the T to report the foul then come back across the court before bouncing the ball to the shooter. A few seconds saved here and there all help the game move faster - especially on those foul fests we love so much!
|
|
|||
I'd force it after 2 or 3.
|
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
Never hit a piņata if you see hornets flying out of it. |
|
|||
No!
__________________
-- #thereferee99 |
|
|||
Absolutely!
Quote:
![]()
__________________
There was the person who sent ten puns to friends, with the hope that at least one of the puns would make them laugh. No pun in ten did. |
|
|||
I think in your situation where team is trying to foul its not as bad as it would be earlier in the game where you get "stuck" calling three or four fouls in a row. In that case I would force a switch at some point.
|
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
2-person mechanic | Clark Kent | Basketball | 8 | Fri Dec 11, 2009 03:05am |
2 person mechanic on web? | roadking | Softball | 10 | Tue Mar 18, 2008 09:18am |
3 Person Mechanic Question | rwest | Softball | 3 | Wed Feb 21, 2007 04:14pm |
two -person mechanic | MPLAHE | Basketball | 21 | Wed Nov 02, 2005 03:45pm |
Three person mechanic | FUBLUE | Softball | 11 | Tue Feb 03, 2004 10:04am |