The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 30, 2009, 12:44pm
Rich's Avatar
Get away from me, Steve.
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 15,779
Late game new 2-person FT mechanic

This happened a few weeks ago.

Double bonus. I'm trail. Defense is losing, looking to foul. Quick one, I call the foul. I go to my new spot as the trail, tableside. Free throws. Losing team comes down, scores quickly.

Repeat the paragraph above six times.

I called the last eight fouls in the game against the team that was trailing.

In retrospect, I felt like I should've forced a switch somewhere in there. Didn't seem to bother anyone, but I felt like I had to work way too hard.

Anyone else have this happen yet?
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 30, 2009, 12:51pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 277
I'm not a fan of the new mechanic partly for this reason. Switching every time just seems better to me. This new mechanic means you sometimes switch (no free throws or lead calling foul w/free throws) or sometimes you don't (trail calling foul w/free throws). It just hasn't felt comfortable for me yet.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 30, 2009, 12:54pm
Rich's Avatar
Get away from me, Steve.
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 15,779
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hartsy View Post
I'm not a fan of the new mechanic partly for this reason. Switching every time just seems better to me. This new mechanic means you sometimes switch (no free throws or lead calling foul w/free throws) or sometimes you don't (trail calling foul w/free throws). It just hasn't felt comfortable for me yet.
To be honest, the most awkward part for me has been working the FT. In 3-person, you only have to worry about the table and subs and then working the rebound.

In 2-person, you feel like you need to signal the table on the number of shots (with your back to it), count on the FT, raise your hand, step down, and still have the table responsibilities -- all this was easier when you were naturally looking at the table from opposite side.

All in all, though, it's not really a huge deal. We haven't long-switched on a foul going the other way or any back court fouls in years, so not switching isn't a huge deal for me.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 30, 2009, 01:01pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 1,273
I don't care for the new mechanic for pretty much the same reasons Rich listed - glad Oregon is not using it.
__________________
Meddle not in the affairs of dragons - for thou art crunchy and taste good with ketchup!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 30, 2009, 01:47pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 716
Quote:
Originally Posted by RichMSN View Post
This happened a few weeks ago.

Double bonus. I'm trail. Defense is losing, looking to foul. Quick one, I call the foul. I go to my new spot as the trail, tableside. Free throws. Losing team comes down, scores quickly.

Repeat the paragraph above six times.

I called the last eight fouls in the game against the team that was trailing.

In retrospect, I felt like I should've forced a switch somewhere in there. Didn't seem to bother anyone, but I felt like I had to work way too hard.

Anyone else have this happen yet?
Same thing has happened to me in 3-man varsity games.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 30, 2009, 01:57pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: In a little pink house
Posts: 5,289
Being closer to the benches, having to look over my shoulder for subs, those don't bother me. But I have noticed numerous times this season where I feel like I've become "stuck" at one end and am making all the calls. I now pre-game that if I've had the last two fouls and gotten "stuck" at T, on the next one I'm going to force a switch.

I'll be interested to hear if the NFHS has anything to say about how wildly successful the new mechanic has been (or hasn't been). From my experience so far the anticipated positive of being nearer the coaches to address concerns has been outweighed by the actual negative of getting "stuck" at T thus giving the impression that, at times, one official is "calling the whole game" and reducing the benefits gained by switching making it more likely that one official really is calling the whole game, at least at one end.
__________________
"It is not enough to do your best; you must know what to do, and then do your best." - W. Edwards Deming
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 30, 2009, 02:29pm
Courageous When Prudent
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Hampton Roads, VA
Posts: 14,843
Quote:
Originally Posted by TimTaylor View Post
I don't care for the new mechanic for pretty much the same reasons Rich listed - glad Oregon is not using it.
Isn't this the part of the thread where someone says "you're just afraid of talking to coaches"?
__________________
A-hole formerly known as BNR
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 30, 2009, 03:30pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,280
Quote:
Originally Posted by RichMSN View Post
This happened a few weeks ago.

Double bonus. I'm trail. Defense is losing, looking to foul. Quick one, I call the foul. I go to my new spot as the trail, tableside. Free throws. Losing team comes down, scores quickly.

Repeat the paragraph above six times.

I called the last eight fouls in the game against the team that was trailing.

In retrospect, I felt like I should've forced a switch somewhere in there. Didn't seem to bother anyone, but I felt like I had to work way too hard.

Anyone else have this happen yet?
Yes, it has happened to me in several games already this year where I'm the Trail after the ball has been throw in in the BC and the losing team fouls immediately. We go to the other end and I stand table side 4-5 times in a row.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 30, 2009, 03:56pm
mj mj is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 461
Yep, happened in our second 2 person game this year. We discussed after the game that in the future we might force a switch after about 4 or 5 in a row.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 30, 2009, 04:24pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 151
I don't mind the new mechanic; one real positive is that we are ready for a free throw a lot quicker now. Not having to wait for the T to report the foul then come back across the court before bouncing the ball to the shooter. A few seconds saved here and there all help the game move faster - especially on those foul fests we love so much!
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 30, 2009, 09:05pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 15,002
Quote:
Originally Posted by mj View Post
Yep, happened in our second 2 person game this year. We discussed after the game that in the future we might force a switch after about 4 or 5 in a row.
I'd force it after 2 or 3.
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 30, 2009, 09:41pm
Aleve Titles to Others
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: East Westchester of the Southern Conference
Posts: 5,381
Send a message via AIM to 26 Year Gap
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fritz View Post
I don't mind the new mechanic; one real positive is that we are ready for a free throw a lot quicker now. Not having to wait for the T to report the foul then come back across the court before bouncing the ball to the shooter. A few seconds saved here and there all help the game move faster - especially on those foul fests we love so much!
The congrats on the missed FT by the shooter's teammates take much more time than the trail getting into position opposite table.
__________________
Never hit a piņata if you see hornets flying out of it.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old Thu Dec 31, 2009, 01:53am
#thereferee99
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 624
No!

Quote:
Originally Posted by RichMSN View Post
Anyone else have this happen yet?
... oh wait a minute...

I agree completely!

Next time I will force a switch at an appropriate time.
__________________
-- #thereferee99
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old Thu Dec 31, 2009, 06:16am
9/11 - Never Forget
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 5,642
Send a message via Yahoo to grunewar
Absolutely!

Quote:
Originally Posted by 26 Year Gap View Post
The congrats on the missed FT by the shooter's teammates take much more time than the trail getting into position opposite table.
These kids are watching too much tv!
__________________
There was the person who sent ten puns to friends, with the hope that at least one of the puns would make them laugh. No pun in ten did.
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old Thu Dec 31, 2009, 09:48am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 109
I think in your situation where team is trying to foul its not as bad as it would be earlier in the game where you get "stuck" calling three or four fouls in a row. In that case I would force a switch at some point.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
2-person mechanic Clark Kent Basketball 8 Fri Dec 11, 2009 03:05am
2 person mechanic on web? roadking Softball 10 Tue Mar 18, 2008 09:18am
3 Person Mechanic Question rwest Softball 3 Wed Feb 21, 2007 04:14pm
two -person mechanic MPLAHE Basketball 21 Wed Nov 02, 2005 03:45pm
Three person mechanic FUBLUE Softball 11 Tue Feb 03, 2004 10:04am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:59am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1