|  | 
|  | 
| 
 | |||
| 
			
			Good question. My knee jerk reaction is to say the fifth player must wait until the next opportunity to sub. However, one way of reading the (b) case is that the player may return at any time as long as his/her return is not deceitful nor does it provide him/her an advantage.
		 
				__________________ "It is not enough to do your best; you must know what to do, and then do your best." - W. Edwards Deming | 
| 
 | |||
| Quote: 
 Quote: 
   Last edited by tjones1; Sat Dec 05, 2009 at 12:49am. | 
| 
 | |||
| 
			
			Never thought about this before, but the way the rule reads the 5th player cannot return without penalty at all.  The technical foul is for the failure of all players to return at the same time, not for one or more players return at the wrong time.  The way I read it, the technical should be assessed when the officials realize the team has only 4 on the floor, whether the 5th player actually returns or not.
		 
				__________________ I swear, Gus, you'd argue with a possum. It'd be easier than arguing with you, Woodrow. Lonesome Dove | 
| 
 | |||
| Quote: 
 DELAYING RETURN FOLLOWING TIME-OUT 10.1.9 SITUATION: Following a charged time-out Team B is still with their coach on the sideline when the official sounds the whistle to indicate play will resume. Four players of B return to the court just in time to play defense as A1 attempts an unsuccessful three-pointer. B1 rebounds and throws a long pass to B5 who enters the court just in time to catch the pass. RULING: A technical foul is immediately charged to Team B for failing to have all players return to the court at approximately the same time following a time-out or intermission. While it is true the entire team may be off the court while the procedure is being used, once a team responds, all players must enter the court at approximately the same time. | 
| 
 | |||
| Quote: 
 Quote: 
 -Josh | 
| 
 | |||
| Quote: 
 
				__________________ I swear, Gus, you'd argue with a possum. It'd be easier than arguing with you, Woodrow. Lonesome Dove | 
| 
 | |||
| 
			
			Not sure I agree it's a technical foul immediately once the officials notice there are only 4 players. I think once the 5th returns that's when you can say that they all didn't return at approximately the same time. Without the 5th returning, who is to say that they didn't all return at the same time? Following the time-out, maybe they only had 4 players available to play. How are we to know? If it's charged immediately once the officials notice there are only 4 players, why did they offer the piece of information in red in the case play? DELAYING RETURN FOLLOWING TIME-OUT 10.1.9 SITUATION: Following a charged time-out Team B is still with their coach on the sideline when the official sounds the whistle to indicate play will resume. Four players of B return to the court just in time to play defense as A1 attempts an unsuccessful three-pointer. B1 rebounds and throws a long pass to B5 who enters the court just in time to catch the pass. RULING: A technical foul is immediately charged to Team B for failing to have all players return to the court at approximately the same time following a time-out or intermission. While it is true the entire team may be off the court while the procedure is being used, once a team responds, all players must enter the court at approximately the same time. | 
| 
 | |||
| 
			
			In this particular case play, the return of B5 is what calls the matter to the officials' attention, but, nevertheless, the return is not what the technical foul is for.  The interp quoted above specifies that this call is not based on  advantage gained, but rather the simple fact that the players must all return at the same time.
		 
				__________________ I swear, Gus, you'd argue with a possum. It'd be easier than arguing with you, Woodrow. Lonesome Dove | 
| 
 | |||
| Quote: 
 Scenario.......... 'A' fails to have five players return to floor. With 30 seconds to go,they have a one point lead and are in a stall situation. A coach realizes they are missing a player and holds A5 from entering court as a T is forthcoming. Assuming your logic regarding T, if I'm A coach, A5 is not going in, period. | 
| 
 | |||
| Quote: 
 
				__________________ Owner/Developer of RefTown.com Commissioner, Portland Basketball Officials Association | 
| 
 | |||
| 
			
			This is what happens when I reply to posts here when I should be sleeping instead.    
				__________________ "It is not enough to do your best; you must know what to do, and then do your best." - W. Edwards Deming | 
|  | 
| Bookmarks | 
| 
 |  | 
|  Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post | 
| Bittersweet Return | BBall_Junkie | Basketball | 8 | Wed Dec 12, 2007 09:33am | 
| Should the MLB return to the balloon?? | Bassman | Baseball | 29 | Sun Aug 19, 2007 02:28am | 
| NE/BUF INT return | AndrewMcCarthy | Football | 2 | Mon Sep 11, 2006 07:31pm | 
| Runners return? | your boss | Baseball | 5 | Tue Jun 06, 2006 08:01am | 
| The return of the Davism | Mark Padgett | Basketball | 1 | Wed Apr 24, 2002 08:28am |